'Not for SC to interfere in religious practices': Justice Indu Malhotra dissents against majority judgment in Sabarimala case
Justice Malhotra, the lone woman judge in the bench, passed a dissenting judgment and said that issues which have deep religious connotation should not be tinkered with.
Justice Indu Malhotra, the lone woman judge on the bench which ruled on the entry of women into the Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala on Friday, dissented with the majority judgment and said issues that have deep religious connotations should not be tinkered with to maintain secular atmosphere in the country.
While the five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, in its 4:1 verdict, said that banning the entry of women into the shrine is gender discrimination and violates rights of Hindu women, Justice Malhotra said it is not for courts to determine which religious practices are to be struck down except in issues of social evils like 'sati'.
Justices RF Nariman and DY Chandrachud concurred with the CJI and Justice AM Khanwilkar.
File image of Justice Indu Malhotra. News18
Related Articles
Justice Malhotra said, "India has diverse religious practices and constitutional morality would allow anyone to profess and practice a religion she/he believes in and it is not for the court to interfere in such religious practices, even if it may appear discriminatory," News18 reported.
Justice Malhotra also said right to equality conflicts with right to worship of devotees of Lord Ayyappa. She added the issue is not limited to Sabarimala only, but it will have far reaching implications for other places of worship. She also said notions of rationality cannot be brought into matters of religion and equality doctrine cannot override fundamental right to worship under Article 25.
One of the contentions before the court was whether the devotees of Lord Ayyappa formed a separate religious denomination or not. CJI Misra said devotion cannot be subjected to discrimination and patriarchal notion cannot be allowed to trump equality in devotion while adding that the devotees of Lord Ayyappa do not constitute a separate denomination.
However, Justice Malhotra ruled that "respondents have made out a strong case for Ayyappa devotees being a separate denomination" and stated that "a balance needs to be struck between religious beliefs on one hand and cherished principles of non-discrimination and equality laid down by Constitution on the other," according to News18.
Justice Nariman said the Sabarimala temple custom barring women between the ages of 10 and 50 is not backed by articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution. Justice Chandrachud said religion cannot be used as cover to deny rights of worship to women and is also against human dignity. He said prohibition on women is due to non-religious reasons and it is a grim shadow of discrimination going on for centuries.
With inputs from PTI
also read
Pakistan: Court extends bar on Imran Khan's arrest till May 31
The court was hearing PTI's plea seeking details of all the cases filed against Imran Khan, whose party said the PTI chief was booked in over 100 cases across the country
SC declines PIL seeking new Parliament building inauguration by President Droupadi Murmu
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, said if the petition is allowed to be withdrawn, then it will be filed in the high court. The bench then dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Centre files review plea in SC as battle to control Delhi services intensifies, Kejriwal vows to challenge ordinance
On Friday, the Centre passed an ordinance creating a National Capital Civil Service Authority to deal with service conditions, transfer and posting of officials, seen as a move to wrest back control after the May 11 apex court ruling that gave Delhi government powers over services