Nobody has the right to rape a woman even if she is habituated to sexual intercourse, says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that nobody has the right to rape a woman even if a woman is of easy virtue, while setting aside a Delhi high court verdict that acquitted four men of rape in a 1997 case.

FP Staff October 31, 2018 13:28:53 IST
Nobody has the right to rape a woman even if she is habituated to sexual intercourse, says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that a woman has a "right to refuse to submit herself to sexual intercourse to anyone" even if she is habituated to sexual intercourse and that no inference on her "character" is permissible from that, while setting aside a Delhi High Court verdict that acquitted four men of rape in a 1997 case.

"Even in cases where there is some material to show that the victim was habituated to sexual intercourse, no inference like the victim being a woman of ‘loose moral character' is permissible to be drawn from that circumstance alone," said a bench of justices R Banumathi and Indira Banerjee.

The bench also ordered an inquiry against the police officers who investigated the case. "Even assuming that the prosecutrix was of easy virtue, she has a right to refuse to submit herself to sexual intercourse to anyone," said the court, reported Bar and Bench.

Nobody has the right to rape a woman even if she is habituated to sexual intercourse says Supreme Court

File image of the Supreme Court of India. PTI

The case was that the accused entered the jhuggi of the complainant at Shaheed Bhagat Singh Jhuggi Camp, Katwaria Sarai in Delhi on 28 July 1997 and raped her.

Charges were then framed against the accused under Section 376(2)(g) of the IPC to which they pleaded not guilty. The accused in their statement under Section 313 CrPC had earlier stated that the complainant was of bad character and she was indulging in prostitution and therefore said that they were falsely implicated in the rape case. They also told the court that a complaint was lodged by them against her though nothing was produced before the court.

The trial court convicted them taking into account the evidence of the complainant.

However, the accused the moved the Delhi High Court, where they presented the alleged complaints that were made against the prosecutrix, during the hearing. The high court then observed that the trial court made a mistake in saying that the accused failed to prove the making of previous complaints against the complainant. The court then acquitted the accused of rape.

The bench observed that the high court was not right in taking into consideration those complaints produced at the time of arguments in the appeal.

Referring to the judgment in State of Maharashtra and Another versus Madhurkar Narayan Mardikar, the bench said that the evidence of a woman cannot be dismissed only because she is a woman of easy virtue.

The bench then stated that the trial court judgement can be restored on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix if it inspires confidence, and affirmed the sentence of 10 years imposed on the accused by the trial court.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Prashant Bhushan contempt case: SC says 'need to check statements regarding corruption'; next hearing on 17 August
India

Prashant Bhushan contempt case: SC says 'need to check statements regarding corruption'; next hearing on 17 August

The Supreme Court on Monday said further hearing was required in the 2009 criminal contempt case against activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan and journalist Tarun Tejpal and adjourned the matter till 17 August

Plea in SC seeks to remove words 'socialist', 'secular' from Constitution's preamble
India

Plea in SC seeks to remove words 'socialist', 'secular' from Constitution's preamble

The court is conducting day-to-day hearings in the case to complete the trial by 31 August, as directed by the Supreme Court.

Dummy mobile no, hospital address can be used for testing mentally ill homeless people of COVID-19, ICMR tells Delhi HC
India

Dummy mobile no, hospital address can be used for testing mentally ill homeless people of COVID-19, ICMR tells Delhi HC

The ICMR proposed the solution as mentally ill homeless persons were not being tested for COVID-19 for the lack of a government issued identity card, an address proof or a mobile number as required under the testing guidelines issued by the ICMR