'No, Mr Attorney, I don’t think we could've used Rafale in Kargil War': Govt's hypothetical defence shut down by CJI Ranjan Gogoi

New Delhi: Had Rafale fighter jets been used during the Kargil war in 1999, the number of casualties would have been less, the Centre told the Supreme Court Wednesday while justifying the acquisition of 36 Rafale fighter jets from France. [caption id=“attachment_4703001” align=“alignleft” width=“380”] File image of Attorney General of India KK Venugopal. Wikipedia Commons[/caption] “Soldiers lost their lives in the Kargil war. Had Rafale been used during the war, it could have hit the hilltops from 60 kilometres away,” Attorney General KK Venugopal told a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi. The CJI then said, “Mr Attorney, Kargil was in 1999-2000? Rafale came in 2014.” Venugopal laughed and said, “I meant hypothetically, if Rafale would have been there during the Kargil war.” He said that all due procedures were followed while entering into the inter-government agreement with France for the acquisition of 36 Rafale jets, and all decisions were approved by the Defence Acquisition Council. “This is a sensitive area and a necessity of the country. Even the Air Force chief has been writing to us to enhance the capability of the force owing to depleting fleet of aircraft,” the AG said while concluding his arguments during the day-long hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the Rafale deal.