A day after he introduced the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, 2023 in the Rajya Sabha, Union Minister of Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal on Friday said that there was nothing wrong with the proposed legislation as it has been brought as per the directive of the Supreme Court. “Supreme Court had given a decision in this regard…So we brought the law according to the decision of the Supreme Court…,” he said.
#WATCH | Delhi: Union Minister of Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal says, "Supreme Court had given a decision in this regard...So we brought the law according to the decision of the Supreme Court...In the new Bill, we are forming a Search Committee which will be led by the… https://t.co/v7b8MkbiES pic.twitter.com/IkNyvw43Oq
— ANI (@ANI) August 11, 2023
He said the new Bill stipulates the formation of a Search Committee which will be led by the Cabinet Secretary “…After that, there will be a Selection Committee which will be led by the Prime Minister. What is wrong with that?…,” asked the law minister. The Centre on Thursday tabled a contentious Bill in Rajya Sabha that seeks to replace the Chief Justice of India with a cabinet minister in the panel for selection of the chief election commissioner and election commissioners. The Bill comes months after the Supreme Court in March ruled that a three-member panel, headed by the Prime Minister and comprising the leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha and the Chief Justice of India, will select the CEC and ECs till a law is framed by Parliament on the appointment of these commissioners. According to the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, 2023, tabled by Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal in the Upper House, a three-member Selection Committee comprising the Prime Minister, who will be the chairperson, the LoP and a Union Cabinet minister, who would be nominated by the Prime Minister, shall select the CEC and ECs. The Bill was introduced amid an uproar by the Opposition parties, including the Congress, Trinamool, AAP and Left parties, that accused the government of “diluting and overturning” a Supreme Court Constitution bench order. The BJP, however, said the government is well within its right to bring the Bill. “Read the Supreme Court judgment. It had suggested a transient method for appointment of the CEC in absence of a statutory mechanism. The government is well within its right to bring in a bill for the same,” BJP’s IT department head Amit Malviya posted on ‘X’, formerly Twitter. A vacancy will arise in the Election Commission (EC) early next year when Election Commissioner Anup Chandra Pandey demits office on 14 February on attaining the age of 65 years. His retirement will come just days before the likely announcement of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls’ schedule by the EC. On the past two occasions, the commission had announced parliamentary elections in March. The apex court in its March verdict had aimed at insulating the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and election commissioners from the Executive’s interference. It had ruled that their appointments would be made by the President on the advice of a committee comprising the Prime minister, LoP in Lok Sabha and the Chief Justice of India. A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice KM Joseph, in a unanimous verdict, held that this norm will continue to hold good till a law on the issue is made by Parliament. Before the Supreme Court ruling, the chief election commissioner and election commissioners were appointed by the President on the recommendation of the government. With inputs from agencies