MJ Akbar versus Priya Ramani: Delhi court to pass order on transfer of defamation suit on 22 October

Principal District and Sessions Judge Sujata Kohli pointed out that if it is found that the magisterial court trying the matter did not have jurisdiction, the entire trial, and not just the final argument, gets vitiated

Press Trust of India October 14, 2020 17:41:46 IST
MJ Akbar versus Priya Ramani: Delhi court to pass order on transfer of defamation suit on 22 October

Representational Iamge. MJ Akbar, left, Priya Ramani, right.

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Wednesday said if it is found that the magisterial court trying the criminal defamation case filed by former Union minister MJ Akbar against journalist Priya Ramani for two years did not have the jurisdiction, the entire trial, and not just the final argument, gets vitiated.

The observation came from the court which will pass an order on 22 October on whether to transfer a criminal defamation complaint from the court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) to another judge.

An ACMM trying the case had on Tuesday sent the matter to Principal District and Sessions Judge seeking transfer of the matter to another court on the ground that his court was designated to hear cases filed against lawmakers.

Principal District and Sessions Judge Sujata Kohli, who reserved the order, noted that the notification does not bar the Magistrate concerned from hearing matters other than those against MPs and MLAs.

However, the object behind the notification is that the cases against the lawmakers be decided expeditiously, the judge said.

She, however, pointed out that in case it is found that the magisterial court trying the matter did not have the jurisdiction, the entire trial, and not just the final argument, gets vitiated.

"None of the counsel raised this point earlier. If we go behind the issue that the court has no jurisdiction, not just the final argument but the entire proceeding gets vitiated," the judge said.

During the arguments, senior advocate Geeta Luthra, appearing for Akbar, said that almost entire trial was over and only a few dates were remaining.

"Great prejudice would be caused if the matter is the further delayed," the counsel said.

The counsel appearing for Ramani, however, said that the accused had no objection to any order passed by the court.

Updated Date:

also read

Four dead after fire breaks out in a building in Delhi's Old Seemapuri area
India

Four dead after fire breaks out in a building in Delhi's Old Seemapuri area

The fire department received information about the fire at 4.07 am, following which four fire tenders arrived at the scene to bring the fire under control

SSC SI Delhi Police, CAPF and ASI CISF Paper-II marks released; check scores at ssc.nic.in
India

SSC SI Delhi Police, CAPF and ASI CISF Paper-II marks released; check scores at ssc.nic.in

This year, a total of 5,108 candidates have passed Paper-II and are eligible to appear for the medical examination

'Such practices require iron-hand handling': Delhi court imposes Rs 2 lakh cost for filing false property case
India

'Such practices require iron-hand handling': Delhi court imposes Rs 2 lakh cost for filing false property case

Additional Senior Civil Judge Kishor Kumar also issued a show cause notice to the litigant asking why a complaint should not be made against him for raising a false claim