Lawyer who took NDA to Supreme Court over Rafale deal files plea seeking hearing after Assembly elections

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi is likely to hear tomorrow the two PILs, filed by lawyers Manohar Lal Sharma and Vineet Dhanda, on India's deal with France to buy the Rafale fighter jets.

Press Trust of India October 30, 2018 19:56:33 IST
Lawyer who took NDA to Supreme Court over Rafale deal files plea seeking hearing after Assembly elections

New Delhi: A lawyer, the first to drag the NDA government to the Supreme Court over the Rafale fighter jet deal, has filed an interim plea seeking hearing on his PIL after assembly polls in five states in November to counter the allegation that his was a politically-motivated petition.

The poll panel has recently announced the dates for assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Mizoram and Telangana. They would conclude by November end.

Lawyer who took NDA to Supreme Court over Rafale deal files plea seeking hearing after Assembly elections

File image of a Rafale fighter jet. Wikimedia Commons

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi is likely to hear on Wednesday the two PILs, filed by lawyers Manohar Lal Sharma and Vineet Dhanda, on India's deal with France to buy the fighter jets.

The bench, also comprising Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph, on 10 October had directed the Centre to provide in a sealed cover the "details of the steps" taken in the decision making process, sans pricing and technical information, which led to the deal.

Sharma, who filed an interim plea in his pending PIL, has referred to certain media reports to allege that the French Dassault company "accepted to work with Reliance as an 'imperative and obligatory' condition for securing the fighter contract".

The lawyer mentioned on Tuesday the plea before the bench which asked him to provide its copy tomorrow.

Besides seeking nod to initiate the detailed arguments, the lawyer has also sought a direction to Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited and its head to file "all relevant documents of the Rafale deal belonging to them".

The lawyer, in his PIL, has sought to quash the inter-government agreement between India and France on account of the violation of "defence procurement procedure" and subsequent registration of an FIR in the case.

The apex court had earlier termed the averments made in the two PILs as "grossly inadequate" and had made it clear that it was not issuing notice on them, but had wanted to satisfy itself about legitimacy of the decision making process.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Seven ex-bureaucrats move SC over Sudarshan News 'UPSC jihad' show, urge order on scope of hate speech
India

Seven ex-bureaucrats move SC over Sudarshan News 'UPSC jihad' show, urge order on scope of hate speech

The Delhi HC earlier declined to stay the telecast of the series which claimed to "expose the conspiracy of Muslims to infiltrate civil services"

Supreme Court extends relief on NPAs after govt says interest issue being considered at 'highest level'
India

Supreme Court extends relief on NPAs after govt says interest issue being considered at 'highest level'

The Centre told the court an expert panel has been set up to look into the interest being charged by banks on instalments deferred during the moratorium

Airlines to give full refund for tickets booked during lockdown period: DGCA proposes in SC
India

Airlines to give full refund for tickets booked during lockdown period: DGCA proposes in SC

The DGCA also said that if airlines are not able to refund the amount, they shall provide a credit shell equal to the amount of fare collected