Kerala floods: Narendra Modi govt cites policy in refusing aid from UAE, but 2015 scheme allows aid

The Centre has  refused to accept aid relief of Rs 700 crore ($100 million), reportedly offered by the United Arab Emirates, citing policy, but its own 2015 policy allows such aid to be accepted “as a goodwill gesture”. “The Government of India deeply appreciates offers from several countries, including from foreign governments, to assist in relief and rehabilitation efforts after the tragic floods in Kerala. In line with the existing policy, the Government is committed to meeting the requirements for relief and rehabilitation through domestic efforts,” according to an official  statement from the ministry of external affairs on 22 August 2018. [caption id=“attachment_5032381” align=“alignleft” width=“380”] Kerala faced the worst floods in a century this month, leaving over 350 dead. Twitter/@PIBIndia[/caption] That is contrary to the government’s official policy. “If the national government of another country voluntarily offers assistance as a goodwill gesture in solidarity with the disaster victims, the Central Government may accept the offer,” says chapter 9 of  The National Disaster Management Plan (NDMP),  cleared by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government in 2015. The home ministry should coordinate with the external affairs ministry–the agency primarily responsible for reviewing offers of foreign assistance–and the concerned state government, if it is to accept foreign aid, the NDMP states. Quoting the NDMP, Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan and finance minister Thomas Isaac have asked the Centre to accept the offer. If the Centre remains silent or rejects the offer, Vijayan and Isaac have said that Delhi must compensate the state for the missed opportunity to receive funds offered as goodwill.

National Disaster Management Plan Chapter 9 on international cooperation accepts that in time severe calamity voluntary aid given by a foreign gov can be accepted. Still if Union Gov chooses to adopt a negative stance towards offer made byUAE gov they should compensate Kerala

— Thomas Isaac (@drthomasisaac) August 22, 2018

Faced with the destruction left by the worst monsoon floods in 94 years, 1.2 million in relief camps and now over 400 dead, Kerala has been appealing to the public and private donors to help reconstruction efforts.

Kerala is facing its worst flood in 100 years. 80 dams opened, 324 lives lost and 223139 people are in about 1500+ relief camps. Your help can rebuild the lives of the affected. Donate to https://t.co/FjYFEdOsyl #StandWithKerala.

— CMO Kerala (@CMOKerala) August 17, 2018

The state has requested financial aid of Rs 2,200 crore ($286 million) from the Centre, but just over a third has been pledged so far. The Rs 600 crore Central aid is less than the cost of one Rafale fighter jet (Rs 670 crore), 36 of which India hopes to buy from France, IndiaSpend  reported on 22 August, 2018.  

We asked Union Gov for financial support of ₹2200 Cr ; they grant us a precious ₹600 Cr . We make no request to any foreign gov but UAE gov voluntarily offer ₹700cr. No, says Union gov , it is below our dignity to accept foreign aid. This is a dog in the manger policy.

— Thomas Isaac (@drthomasisaac) August 22, 2018

The government’s refusal to accept foreign aid appears to  follow a policy established in 2004 following a tsunami. “We are following the policy since 2004, and have been turning down assistance from foreign governments since then,” a government source told the Indian Express. “In Kerala also, we are sticking to that policy.”

India received Rs 950 crore in foreign aid from a mixture of inter-governmental organisations and individual nations in 2016-17, according to this  response to a Lok Sabha question in March 2017. Over the past decade, the UK has been the largest donor of foreign aid, followed by  The Global Fund, an international financing organisation to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, and the European Union. The author is a writer and researcher with IndiaSpend. FactChecker.in is fact-checking initiative, scrutinising for veracity and context statements made by individuals and organisations in public life