Kerala-based Sunni Muslim group moves Supreme Court against triple talaq ordinance, calls it 'arbitrary'

The Samastha Kerala Jam’eyyath ul-Ulama, a religious organisation of Sunni Muslim scholars and clerics, filed a petition in Supreme Court on Tuesday against the triple talaq ordinance, according to ANI.

FP Staff September 25, 2018 16:05:31 IST
Kerala-based Sunni Muslim group moves Supreme Court against triple talaq ordinance, calls it 'arbitrary'

The Samastha Kerala Jam’eyyath ul-Ulama, a religious organisation of Sunni Muslim scholars and clerics, filed a petition in Supreme Court on Tuesday against the triple talaq ordinance, ANI reported.

In its plea, the Kerala-based outfit challenged the constitutionality of the ordinance and said that the ordinance is arbitrary, CNN-News18 reported.

On 19 September, the Union Cabinet approved the ordinance to ban the practice of instant triple talaq. President Ram Nath Kovind later signed the ordinance.

Keralabased Sunni Muslim group moves Supreme Court against triple talaq ordinance calls it arbitrary

Representational image. AP

The ordinance has made the practice of giving instant triple talaq illegal and void, and the offender will attract a jail term of three years.

In a bid to allay fears that the law could be misused, the government has included certain safeguards in it, such as adding a provision of bail for the accused before trial. These amendments were cleared by the Cabinet on 29 August.

While the law makes instant triple talaq a "non-bailable" offence, an accused can approach a magistrate even before trial to seek bail. In a non-bailable offence, bail cannot be granted by police at the police station itself.

One provision also allows the magistrate to grant bail "after hearing the wife". Sources told PTI that the magistrate would ensure that bail is granted only after the husband agrees to grant compensation to the wife as provided in the bill. The quantum of compensation will be decided by the magistrate, as per the bill.

The police would lodge an FIR only if approached by the victim (wife), her immediate family members, or people who become her relatives by virtue of her marriage. Neighbours and others cannot lodge a complaint under the proposed law.

The offence of instant triple talaq is "compoundable". Now, a magistrate can use his powers to settle the dispute between a husband and his wife. This will happen only when the wife approaches the court. Under a compoundable offence, both parties have the liberty of withdrawing the case.

The proposed law would only be applicable on instant triple talaq or 'talaq-e-biddat' and it would give power to the victim to approach a magistrate seeking "subsistence allowance" for herself and minor children.

A woman can also seek the custody of her minor children from the magistrate who will take a final call on the issue.

With inputs from agencies

 

Updated Date:

also read

Supreme Court bench expresses displeasure over new case listing system introduced by Chief Justice UU Lalit
India

Supreme Court bench expresses displeasure over new case listing system introduced by Chief Justice UU Lalit

The new listing system is not giving adequate time to take up matters fixed for hearing like the present case as there are number of matters within the span of an afternoon session, said a bench headed by Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Sourav Ganguly all set to continue as BCCI president for another term after SC accepts amendment to board's constitution
First Cricket News

Sourav Ganguly all set to continue as BCCI president for another term after SC accepts amendment to board's constitution

Supreme court do away with the three-year cooling-off period; allowing Sourav Ganguly and Jay Shah a shot at six-year tenure (two terms of three years each) at a stretch as BCCI president and secretary respectively

Hijab row: Karnataka AG says hijab in classes not akin to transgender rights to dress as expression
India

Hijab row: Karnataka AG says hijab in classes not akin to transgender rights to dress as expression

The apex court is hearing arguments on a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court verdict refusing to lift the ban on hijab in educational institutions of the state that have prescribed uniforms