Justice Chelameswar's letter to CJI: Lawyers' body expresses concern over Centre's interference in appointments of judges
A lawyers' body has expressed grave concern over the issues raised by Supreme Court's senior-most judge Justice J Chelameswar in a letter to the Chief Justice of India urging him to convene a full court to deal with the alleged executive interference in the judiciary
New Delhi: A lawyers' body has expressed grave concern over the issues raised by Supreme Court's senior-most judge Justice J Chelameswar in a letter to the chief justice of India urging him to convene a full court to deal with the alleged executive interference in the judiciary.
"The letter of Justice Chelameswar reveals direct interference of Central government in the process of appointment of judges in the High Court. The letter clearly shows that the independence of the judiciary is in peril now," the All India Lawyers Union (AILU) said in a statement.
It said that lawyers across the country were concerned with the latest revelations made in the letter in which Justice Chelameswar has questioned the probe initiated by Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Dinesh Maheshwari against District and Sessions Judge Krishna Bhat at the request of the Ministry of Law and Justice, despite his name being recommended for elevation twice by the Collegium.
"More painful for the democracy is that the present chief justice of Karnataka High Court has obediently succumbed to the executive pressure. The present govt is not only deliberately destroying the independence of judiciary but few judges are also abetting it," a statement, released by AILU president and senior advocate Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya and General Secretary Som Dutta Sharma, said.
Condemning the move of inquiry against a recommendee of the collegium, the AILU said if the collegium's recommendations cannot be accepted, these should have been referred to the apex court for reconsideration.
"A judge is oath-bound to uphold the Constitution without favour and fear. Chief justice of Karnataka has failed in the instant case to stick to his oath. It's time to raise voice to save both democracy and the Constitution," the statement said.
Justice Chelameswar had shot off a letter on 21 March to the CJI urging him to consider convening a full court to take up the issue of alleged executive interference in the judiciary. He had also cautioned that "the bonhomie between the judiciary and the government in any State sounds the death knell to democracy".
Justice Chelameswar, who had held the unprecedented 12 January press conference along with three other senior judges raising issues including the allocation of cases by the CJI, had said, "We, the judges of the Supreme Court of India, are being accused of ceding our independence and our institutional integrity to the executive's incremental encroachment.
"The executive is always impatient, and brooks no disobedience even of the judiciary if it can. Attempts were always made to treat the chief justices as the departmental heads in the secretariat. So much for our 'independence and pre-eminence' as a distinct State organ."
Supreme Court gives UGC eight weeks to frame guidelines for access to students with disabilities in colleges
UGC is constituting a committee, following the direction of the court, which would look into formulation of guidelines for accessibility of students with disabilities in universities and its colleges
SC restrains Tripura police from acting on notice to Twitter against journalist's tweets on violence
On 17 November, the apex court had directed Tripura Police not to take any coercive action against the three civil society members, including a journalist, in connection with an FIR lodged under the harsh UAPA provisions
A three-judge bench made the observation while setting aside an Allahabad HC order which had termed the fire in the warehouse of a company as an act of God' and exempted excise liability of the company engaged in the manufacture of liquor.