JNU Academic Council didn't pass compulsory attendance resolution, says Madhu Kishwar

New Delhi: JNU Academic Council member and scholar-activist Madhu Kishwar on Saturday said the controversial resolution on compulsory attendance “was not passed in the council”, contradicting the administration’s version. In a series of tweets, Kishwar said, “I planned to raise the matter in the Academic Council meeting of 23 Feb. But since VC has postponed it indefinitely, I may as well clarify that the AC did not pass any resolution regarding compulsory attendance. This issue was not an agenda item. It cropped up accidentally.”

Here is the full thread of my tweets with regard to #JNUFracas over compulsory attendance pic.twitter.com/rbd02WuSUd

— Madhu Purnima Kishwar (@madhukishwar) February 17, 2018

Kishwar was nominated by JNU Vice Chancellor M Jagadesh Kumar last year to represent the School of Arts and Aesthetics (SAA) as an expert from outside the varsity for two years. On 22 December last year, the JNU administration issued a circular which read “144th AC meeting has resolved to approve to make attendance compulsory for all regular registered students”. A committee was also formed based on the decision. Kishwar said it was during a discussion on performance of SC/ST students that the provision of compulsory attendance propped up leading to a heated exchange among members. “Some teachers expressed concern about poor performance of SC and ST students despite special classes. Some pointed out poor performance was related to students not attending even regular classes. In that context someone mentioned need for compulsory attendance,” she tweeted, and added that the council was advised by her to first identify the source of problem and have proper data. “Meeting ended without any decision on this issue,” she added. Kishwar said she was shocked to read reports about the VC implementing compulsory attendance. “It was a rude shock for me to read in newspapers that VC had implemented compulsory attendance for all students, including for PhD students where it makes no sense whatsoever because no regular classes are held at that level. PhD students are expected to do field work or archival research,” she tweeted. Batting for an education system overhaul, she said, “Our universities need all-round overhaul and reorientation. They’ve become hotbed of disruptive politics rather than academic pursuits. But we cannot undertake meaningful reforms in education by creating an atmosphere of civil war and permanent confrontation in campuses.” She stressed the need for a systematic and planned approach to implement compulsory attendance and said, “I’m not in favour of teacher or student absenteeism. Those who come to university, especially on scholarships, must take their classes seriously. If attendance system has to be introduced in JNU, as it exists in IITs, IIMs etc, let it be done in a planned & systematic manner.” On Thursday, hundreds of students had laid seige to the administration block and stopped two rectors from leaving the block