associate sponsors


'Jiyo Parsi' campaign: Misogynistic, clannish, classist ads will not help community's dwindling birth rates

By Sharanya Gopinathan

A music teacher in my Christian school had a favourite Bible verse. It went something like: Trust in the Lord with all your heart, never rely on what you think you know, remember the Lord in everything you do, and He'll show you the right way.

Or something like that. It made a lasting impression. Mostly, because it was such a puzzle. I mean, how were you supposed to live your life without relying on what you think you know?

I got a similar feeling when I saw the new set of Jiyo Parsi print ads — a demand for the suspension of disbelief. In a rare feat, the ads manages to be sexist, clannish, misogynistic and classist, all at once.

The new ads are part of a government-aided campaign to increase the numbers of the dwindling Parsi population in India, which is currently at around 69,000, and which faced an alarming 18 percent decline between 2001 and 2016. The first set of 'Jiyo Parsi' ads, released in 2013, asked you (if you were Parsi) to be responsible and not use a condom tonight... for the sake of the future of the community.

Representational image. Reuters

Representational image. Reuters

The second phase of the campaign attempts to shift the motivation for having kids from the good of the community to the individual, and basically asks you to forget everything you thought you knew about responsible adulthood, in favour of becoming a Parsi-baby-making machine, for your own sake.

You get the feeling that any woman who trusted in 'Jiyo Parsi' with all her heart instead of relying on what she thought she knew was good for her would look back in 30 years at her life and pinpoint this very moment as the one where it all started going horribly wrong.

The first ad, for example, shows a glum-looking woman staring into the distance, accompanied by a checklist of her goals and expectations from life: A car, a flat and a salary of over Rs 1 lakh a month. Goals, which 'Jiyo Parsi' instructs her to junk, because, and I quote, "Wait to check all the boxes and you may check into an old-age home. Alone."

Another ad quotes a person saying kids cost money, to which 'Jiyo Parsi' responds with all the confidence and imagination of a schoolyard bully: "What if your parents had said that?"

It then tells you to go ahead and have a bunch of babies you can't afford, because they'll bring in money to the family at some unknown point in the future. Basically, combine the worst planning and the worst motivation to have kids, and you've got yourself a 'Jiyo Parsi' ad. The ads also operate on the assumption that you're terribly insecure as an adult and constantly in need of some form of validation, which 'Jiyo Parsi' promises you can have — as long as you have babies right now.

For all the confidence, however, the ads have quite a bit of internal contradiction. Take this one, in which they show a mother and child. The copy says, thankfully, she didn't listen to people who told her that marrying and having kids early was regressive, and then says there will always be people telling you that living a normal life is regressive. Which, ironically, seems to be kind of the driving force behind 'Jiyo Parsi' — which repeatedly tells you that it's "cool", progressive and necessary to stop living life the way you currently are, and to immediately make babies you can't afford.

At the same time 'Jiyo Parsi' would also like to peddle you elements of a familiar urban, aspirational cool that all FMCG products sell. One ad warns you that you'll feel bad about watching theatre performances alone, while another actually tells you that if you want a puppy, you should have a baby as well, because that's the "cooler thing to do".

Another ad tells you that you need not move out of your home when you get married, and your parents don't have to move out either; you should instead make peace and everybody should live together (and have babies). On the other hand, the same campaign also tells women that they should want to live with their in-laws after marriage, because they'll miss their son when he grows up and moves out.

It's not a logical leap and hardly the most convincing rhetoric to get people to have babies, but then again, makers of these ads are not really operating on a truth-and-logic mode.

Take the next. It features a man (Homiyar Sachinwalla) sitting on a chair facing a wall for no discernible reason. The text says, you'll inherit your family home when your parents die, and your servant will inherit it when you do. Forget the blatancy of the scare-mongering, isn't it hilarious that this is the scare they even want to monger? Parsi inheritance laws aren't my particular field of expertise, but even I feel certain that the line of ascendancy doesn't go from father to son to "servant", and is it really so bleak and scary if does? Is there nothing on earth that will inspire young Parsis to copulate more than the prospect of sharing their property and wealth with people who work for them?

It's said that part of the reason why the Parsi community is so embattled in India is because community elders are pushing for maintaining the racial purity, high rates of inter-marriage within the community, and the strict (and sexist) laws that regulate who really is a Parsi (children of mixed-marriages are only considered Parsi if their father is).

If reports are saying that the Parsi community needs to shake off its ideas of racial purity and bring "fresh blood" into the gene pool, it might be a good idea not to release loaded ads that suggest you should panic if someone outside your immediate family inherits your family property.

If you aren't Parsi, the ads will perhaps strike you as remotely comic. Or not. Plenty of people are outraged at the ads for a range of reasons. Hilariously, historian and blogger Simin Patel told The Hindu that she was super enraged by these ads, but forgot to criticise them because they came out on the day of Eunice D'Souza's death, so she had other things to think about.

Others point out that it's irresponsible to be encouraging Indians to have more kids when we're already in the midst of a massive over-population problem, that such a campaign would be considered reprehensible if directed at any other community or conceptualised in any other country, while others say it's ridiculous to paint single elderly people as sad, depressed and lonely, which the campaign insists on doing over and over again.

Raj Nair, CEO of Madison BMB, the agency behind this astonishing campaign, said the second phase is a new rendition of the earlier, "deliberately tongue-in-cheek" ads, and that they wanted to focus on relevant and meaningful issues, such as "togetherness" and "that there is no positive outcome to choosing to be alone".

I don't know about you, but this clumsy attempt at eugenics brainwashing is making me want to get into an ad-war and release my own campaign. It will instruct young Parsi men and women to use condoms as they please, do whatever they want with their privates and their careers, and make a small attempt at explaining the difference between babies and puppies. All will be well. 'Jiyo Happy'!

The Ladies Finger (TLF) is a leading online women’s magazine delivering fresh and witty perspectives on politics, culture, health, sex, work and everything in between.

Updated Date: Aug 14, 2017 01:50 AM

Also Watch

Watch: The true stories from Dharavi that inspired Rajinikanth's Kaala
  • Thursday, March 8, 2018 Watch: Cyrus Khan talks about Parkour, jumping across walls and why he hates sitting
  • Thursday, May 31, 2018 Unwind: India's basketball sensation Amjyot Singh has his eyes set on becoming an NBA regular
  • Monday, May 28, 2018 First Day First Showsha — Review of Solo: A Star Wars Story in 10 questions
  • Saturday, May 19, 2018 Social Media Star: Rajkummar Rao and Bhuvan Bam open up about selfie culture, online trolls

Also See

{if $hideJSforEU != 'yes'} {/if}