Has Tarun Tejpal destroyed his credibility completely with the sexual assault case against him? Senior journalist Shefalee Vasudev said that even in the rare possibility that he did survive the legal battle, his voice is completely finished. Speaking to CNN-IBN, she said, “He seems to be smug towards the idea that he is indestructible. As a journalist, either he had no voice and when he gathered one he had a rickety voice. If he survives this voice will not be heard easily.” According to Suhel Seth, managing partner of Counselage, Tejpal could have done three things that would ensure that he would in a better position now. He said, “Tarun should never have applied for anticipatory bail. He should have never sullied the victim’s name, it destroys you forever. He should have offered himself up to the law.” [caption id=“attachment_1258337” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]  Tarun Tejpal. Reuters[/caption] However, Anil Dharker, senior journalist and writer felt that Tarun Tejpal was an easy target for the media and the media had gone into an overkill with the negative coverage about him. “The media has been lazy in not chasing Modi or the SC judge because they have been tactful. Tarun has literally handed over his head on a platter. There is no courage involved in shaming Tejpal, " he said. But there is a difference between media trial and media scrutiny, pointed out CNN-IBN managing editor Vinay Tewari. In Tejpal’s case media scrutiny took the case to its logical conclusion. Tejpal did not cooperate, gave differing statements — which is why often media went into a trial mode.
Has Tarun Tejpal destroyed his credibility completely with the sexual assault case against him?
Advertisement
End of Article


)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
