'Has to be some decorum': SC judges shocked as lawyer in Sudarshan TV case appears shirtless for online hearing

Justice Chadrachud asked the solicitor-general to speak to the lawyer and ensure that such a mistake is not repeated

FP Trending October 27, 2020 17:38:24 IST
'Has to be some decorum': SC judges shocked as lawyer in Sudarshan TV case appears shirtless for online hearing

File image of the Supreme Court of India. PTI

A lawyer left Supreme Court of India judges shocked when he appeared shirtless for a virtual hearing through video-conferencing hearing of the Sudarshan TV case on Monday.

According to Live Law, when the hearing began on Monday, the image of a lawyer without his shirt on flashed on screen for a few seconds.

Justice DY Chandrachud, the presiding judge of the bench, asked repeatedly who the advocate was, but got no response. The lawyer logged out soon from the virtual hearing session.

After the case was adjourned, Justice Chandrachud expressed his displeasure at the incident to Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta.

"There has to be some decorum," Justice Chandrachud said.

Justice Indu Malhotra, who was also part of the apex court bench hearing the case, expressed her disgust at the lawyer's casual attitude and said, “This is very bad.”

Justice Chadrachud asked the solicitor-general to speak to the lawyer and ensure that such a mistake is not repeated.

As per Scroll, the lawyer was representing OpIndia.

Justice Chandrachud also told Mehta that lawyers must observe decorum even during virtual hearings. He said that such incidents were an insult to court.

The apex court was hearing the Sudarshan TV case in which it has imposed a pre-telecast ban on the channel's 'UPSC Jihad' programme.

The show alleged that an NGO named Zakat Foundation,  training mostly Muslims students who aspire to be civil servants, has received funds from a number of terror-linked organisations.

The Centre has issued a show cause notice to the television channel for violating programme code for its Bindas Bol programme series.

Judicial bodies, including the Supreme Court, have been hearing the cases online since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As per a report in Hindustan Times senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan was earlier seen smoking during a virtual hearing of a case.

A lawyer of Rajasthan High Court also was seen in his vest while hearing an online bail plea. The High Court of Gujarat has imposed a penalty of Rs 10,000 on an advocate who was caught smoking during an online case hearing.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

AIFF approaches Supreme Court seeking extension of executive committee's tenure until finalisation of new constitution
Sports

AIFF approaches Supreme Court seeking extension of executive committee's tenure until finalisation of new constitution

The Supreme Court in a 2017 order had appointed a Committee of Administrators to formulate the constitution of the AIFF in consonance with the Sports Code.

By withdrawing general consent, states could render CBI a toothless tiger
India

By withdrawing general consent, states could render CBI a toothless tiger

Over the years, given the lack of general faith in India's law enforcement system, the CBI has managed to maintain the public perception of being a professional investigating agency

Supreme Court grants interim bail to Arnab Goswami in 2018 abetment to suicide case
India

Supreme Court grants interim bail to Arnab Goswami in 2018 abetment to suicide case

A two-judge bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee pulled up the Maharashtra government over the TV anchor's arrest as they heard the petition through video conferencing.