Grant licenses to eight dance bars by 12 May, SC tells Maha govt

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Maharashtra government to grant licences to eight dance bars within two days and asked them to give an undertaking that they would not engage employees with criminal antecedents near the dance area. “It is directed that an undertaking shall be given by appellants who have filed application that they shall not engage employees in the bar and dance area whose names have been mentioned in the affidavit given by the state. “The undertaking shall be issued by tomorrow (Wednesday) and the licences shall be issued by day after tomorrow,” a bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra and Shiva Kirti Singh said. [caption id=“attachment_2692510” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]  Representational image. Reuters[/caption] Maharashtra government had filed an affidavit in the court informing the bench that they had not granted licences to eight dance bars as they found some of their employees had criminal antecedents. Senior advocate Jayant Bhushan, appearing for Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association, said not a single licence has been issued till date. He submitted that as FIR has been lodged against some employees of the bars, licences were not being issued to them on the ground that they have criminal antecedents. “Unless a person is convicted under the offence, he cannot be termed as a criminal. The licences are being delayed on one pretext on the other,” he said. On the issue of increasing the height of railing adjacent to the dance stage, Bhushan told the bench that such deficiencies have been addressed. During the hearing, one of the counsel said that criminal antecedents of dancers should also be looked into and conditions be imposed on them. The court took strong note of this and said “are you trying to convey to us that they are criminals? Nobody can earn livelihood if they are convicted. We want to save the dignity of women. “You want to take away means of their livelihood. Dignity of women has to be maintained and no obscenity of any kind would be allowed,” the bench said. The court has fixed the matter for further hearing on 13 May.