Full text of the judgment: Supreme Court allows entry of women of all ages into Sabarimala temple
The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for entry of women of all ages into the Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala in Kerala as it ruled that the repression of women under the garb of 'physiological factors' cannot be legitimised.
The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for entry of women of all ages into the Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala in Kerala as it said that the repression of women under the garb of "physiological factors" cannot be legitimised.
The Chief Justice Dipak Misra-headed Constitution bench in a 4-1 verdict held that the existing ban violates rights of Hindu women. Observing that patriarchy in religion cannot "trump over" devotion, the Supreme Court bench rejected the vehement submissions of the Travancore Devaswom Board, which runs the temple, and ruled that the devotees of Lord Ayyappa are "exclusively Hindus" and do not constitute a "separate religious denomination".
Justice Indu Malhotra, the only woman judge in the five-judges bench, gave a dissenting judgment. She said, "What constitutes essential practices of religion is to be decided by worshippers and it is not for the judiciary to adjudicate.
"It is not for courts to decide if such practices should be struck down. Rationality cannot be used to judge faith. All followers must be allowed to follow their own faith as per their own beliefs in a secular polity," she said.
Here is the full text of the Supreme Court verdict:
With inputs from PTI
Who will teach men that if they believe they are entitled to being inconsiderate, intolerant, violent, cruel and barbaric just because of their gender then they are seriously delusional!
When the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year and gave control of abortion policy to the states, it led to bans and restrictions in some states, and executive orders and laws protecting access in others
In Italy, parents of two children appealed against the decision of a lower court which had forced the youngsters to spend time with their grandparents. Now, the top court has said that this is not an obligation