Fresh plea against Article 35A: Supreme Court doesn't take up matter after petitioner seeks adjournment of hearing

Article 35A, which was incorporated in the Constitution by a 1954 presidential order, accords special rights and privileges to the citizens of Jammu and Kashmir and bars people from outside the state from acquiring any immovable property in the state.

Press Trust of India August 27, 2018 19:34:57 IST
Fresh plea against Article 35A: Supreme Court doesn't take up matter after petitioner seeks adjournment of hearing

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned its hearing on a fresh plea challenging the constitutional validity of Article 35A, which empowers the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly to define "permanent residents" for bestowing special rights and privileges to them.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud did not take up the matter as the petitioner had circulated a letter in the apex court registry seeking adjournment of hearing on the plea.

Lawyer and Delhi BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay, in a fresh plea, has sought a direction to the central and state governments to declare Article 35A of the Constitution as "arbitrary" on the ground that it was contrary to fundamental rights like the right to equality, dignity of women, freedom of speech and expression and the right to life and personal liberty.

Fresh plea against Article 35A Supreme Court doesnt take up matter after petitioner seeks adjournment of hearing

File photo of Supreme Court of India. AFP

Article 35A, which was incorporated in the Constitution by a 1954 presidential order, accords special rights and privileges to the citizens of Jammu and Kashmir and bars people from outside the state from acquiring any immovable property in the state.

It also denies property rights to a woman who marries a person from outside the state. The provision, which leads to such women from the state forfeiting their right over property, also applies to their heirs.

Earlier, the apex court had adjourned the hearing on a batch of petitions including the one filed by NGO 'We the Citizens', through lawyer Barun Kumar Sinha, till the week commencing on Monday.

It had said that a three-judge bench would decide whether the pleas challenging the Article should be referred to a five-judge Constitution Bench for examining the larger issue of alleged violation of the doctrine of basic structure of the Constitution.

The apex court is hearing a batch of pleas seeking quashing of the Article which confers special status to permanent residents of the state.

Political parties, including the National Conference and the CPM, have moved the Supreme Court in support of Article 35A that empowers the state Assembly to define "permanent residents" for bestowing special rights and privileges to them.

An NGO, 'Ikkjut Jammu', has also filed a plea seeking quashing of the provision. It has said that Article 35-A furthers the "two nation theory which is against the theory of secularism".

The state government, while defending the Article, had cited two verdicts of the constitution benches of the Supreme Court in 1961 and 1969, which had upheld the powers of the president under Article 370(1)(d) of the Constitution to pass constitutional orders.

The Article was incorporated in the Constitution in 1954 by an order of President Rajendra Prasad on the advice of the then Cabinet headed by Jawaharlal Nehru.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

'Genuinely interested to solve problem': SC suspends implementation of farm laws until further notice, forms panel
India

'Genuinely interested to solve problem': SC suspends implementation of farm laws until further notice, forms panel

The ruling came on a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the three farm laws that were enacted last September. A detailed order is expected later today

Supreme Court to pronounce verdict on pleas against Central Vista project today
India

Supreme Court to pronounce verdict on pleas against Central Vista project today

A bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, Sanjiv Khanna will pronounce the verdict on the batch of pleas which question several aspects, including the environmental clearance granted

Constitute bench to resolve SCBA stalemate, lawyers requests CJI after Dushyant Dave resigns as body's president
India

Constitute bench to resolve SCBA stalemate, lawyers requests CJI after Dushyant Dave resigns as body's president

The senior lawyer said all the three members of the the election committee resigned on Friday night as the SCBA refused to accept its decision to hold elections through online mode