First beef, now mutton? Maharashtra govt tells HC it may extend ban on slaughtering goats

The bench directed the government to file its affidavit in reply to the petitions and posted the hearing on 20 April.

hidden April 07, 2015 09:40:14 IST
First beef, now mutton? Maharashtra govt tells HC it may extend ban on slaughtering goats

Mumbai: Asking the Maharashtra government why animals like goats do not figure in its ban on cattle slaughter, the Bombay High Court on Monday mooted a licence policy by which import of meat of cows and bulls slaughtered outside the state can be permitted.

First beef now mutton Maharashtra govt tells HC it may extend ban on slaughtering goats

Representational image. Reuters

A division bench of justices VM Kanade and AR Joshi was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging a provision under Section 5 (d) of the recently amended Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act which bans possession and consumption of meat of animals like cows and bulls.

According to the petitions, the flesh of these animals, if slaughtered outside Maharashtra, should be allowed inside the state.

"Why has the state banned only cows, bulls and bullocks? What about other animals like goat?" the bench
asked.

To this, Advocate General Sunil Manohar said the government was considering it.

"This is just the start (banning of cows, bulls and bullocks). We may consider banning slaughter of other animals too. As of now the state felt it was necessary to protect cows, bulls and bullocks," he said.

The court also suggested that the government have a licence policy by which import of meat of cattle slaughtered outside the state can be permitted.

"Section 5 (d) of the Act which is under challenge does not prohibit slaughter of cattle outside the state. Why should a person be prevented to eat or possess beef that has been slaughtered outside? Indirectly you (government) are prohibiting slaughter of animals outside the state too," Justice Kanade said.

Senior counsel Aspi Chinoy, appearing for one of the petitioners, argued that section 5 (d) of the Act was arbitrary and against the fundamental right of a citizen and that if the object of the Act was to preserve cattle in Maharashtra, then import of meat should be allowed. A report in The Times of India also said that the petitioners claimed that the beef ban violated the right to eat, which came under the fundamental right to life.

Advocate General Manohar, however, objected and said, "How can the state say slaughter of cattle in Maharashtra amounts to cruelty but one can slaughter outside the state? That would also amount to cruelty. The Act incidentally prohibits import also."

The bench directed the government to file its affidavit in reply to the petitions and posted the hearing on 20 April.

PTI

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Formula 1 2020: Lewis Hamilton fastest in final practice ahead of Austrian Grand Prix qualifying
Sports

Formula 1 2020: Lewis Hamilton fastest in final practice ahead of Austrian Grand Prix qualifying

Hamilton was also quickest in both practice sessions on Friday, finishing ahead of his Mercedes teammate Valtteri Bottas in all three.

Maharashtra extends lockdown till 31 July; what's allowed: Non-essential markets in Mumbai to stay open from 9-5; private offices can start with 10% strength
India

Maharashtra extends lockdown till 31 July; what's allowed: Non-essential markets in Mumbai to stay open from 9-5; private offices can start with 10% strength

The Maharashtra government on Monday extended the lockdown imposed as a precautionary measure to contain the spread of COVID-19 till 31 July.

Formula 1 2020: Red Bull lose appeal against Mercedes' Dual Assistant Steering system
Sports

Formula 1 2020: Red Bull lose appeal against Mercedes' Dual Assistant Steering system

Other teams were caught cold by the innovation, with Red Bull claiming in their protest that Mercedes' DAS is both an aerodynamic and a suspension device.