'Doesn't mean I have accepted SC verdict': Prashant Bhushan pays Re 1 fine, says he will file review petition

Bhushan said a 'truth fund' will be created out of contributions received from across the country to provide legal aid to those prosecuted for dissent

Press Trust of India September 14, 2020 16:11:24 IST
'Doesn't mean I have accepted SC verdict': Prashant Bhushan pays Re 1 fine, says he will file review petition

New Delhi: Activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan said on Monday that paying off the token fine of Re 1 imposed on him by the Supreme Court in a contempt case does not mean that he has accepted the verdict and would file a review petition against the judgement.

Bhushan, who deposited the fine with the apex court Registry over his two tweets seen as contempt of court, said that he has received contributions from several corners of the country for paying the fine, and a "truth fund" will be created out of such contributions to provide legal aid to those who are prosecuted for dissenting opinions.

"Just because I'm paying the fine does not mean I have accepted the verdict. We are filing a review plea today. We have filed a writ petition that there must be an appeal procedure created for conviction under contempt," Bhushan told the media before submitting the fine.

"The State is using all means to silence voices of dissent. The ''truth fund'' will be used to protect the personal liberty to those persons who face the State''s persecution", said Bhushan who was accompanied by a group of people from Rajasthan.

The lawyer also spoke on the arrest of former Jawaharlal Nehru University student Umar Khalid for his alleged role in the Delhi riots and said the government is using all sorts of tactics to shut down criticism.

The activist-lawyer had earlier said his tweets were not intended in any way to disrespect the Supreme Court or the judiciary, but they were an expression of his anguish at what he felt was the court''s deviation from its sterling record.

A bench headed by Justice (retired) Arun Mishra asked Bhushan to deposit the fine by 15 September, failing which he would have attracted a jail term of three months and debarment from law practice for three years.

Bhushan in his statement had refused to offer an apology to the Supreme Court for the tweets, saying what he had expressed represented his bona fide belief which he continued to hold.

Updated Date:

also read

'Wholly uncalled for': SC slams Kerala government over relaxations granted for Bakrid
India

'Wholly uncalled for': SC slams Kerala government over relaxations granted for Bakrid

The apex court pulled up the state government for giving in to traders' pressure by granting relaxations ahead of Bakrid and said it disclosed a "sorry state of affairs"

Pegasus row: Mamata Banerjee accuses Centre of trying to estalish 'surveillance State'
India

Pegasus row: Mamata Banerjee accuses Centre of trying to estalish 'surveillance State'

The West Bengal chief minister also urged Opposition parties to come together to defeat the BJP in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections

Kanwar Yatra: Why SC has told UP to clarify stand on nod and debate surrounding pilgrimage
India

Kanwar Yatra: Why SC has told UP to clarify stand on nod and debate surrounding pilgrimage

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has urged that only a minimum number of people should participate in the yatra and directed strict implementation of COVID-19 norms