India

Disagreeing with govt can't be seditious, says SC; dismisses PIL demanding action against Farooq Abdullah

The top court was hearing a plea which referred to Abdullah's statement on restoring Article 370, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, and contended it clearly amounts to a seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under Section 124-A of the IPC

Press Trust of India March 03, 2021 21:22:54 IST

New Delhi: Observing that expressing views that are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious, the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL seeking action against National Conference president Farooq Abdullah over his comments on abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution.

A bench of justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta rejected the plea and also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioners for making such claims.

"Expression of views which are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious," the bench observed.

The top court was hearing a plea which referred to his statement on restoring Article 370, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, and contended it clearly amounts to a seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under Section 124-A of the IPC.

The petition, filed by Rajat Sharma and Dr Neh Srivastava from an organisation called the Vishwa Guru India Vision of Sardar Patel, alleged that the former chief minister is trying to "hand over" Kashmir to China and thus, he should be prosecuted for sedition.

"Mr Farooq Abdullah has committed an offence punishable under Section 124-A of Indian Penal Code. As he has made the live statement that for restoring Article 370 he would take help of China which clearly amount to seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under Section 124-A of the IPC," the plea stated.

The petitioners also referred to a statement made by BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra to claim that Abdullah is misleading the people of Jammu and Kashmir to join China for the restoration of Article 370 of the Constitution.

Updated Date: March 03, 2021 21:22:54 IST

Most Read

Most Read

also read

Sports

Indian Women's League playoff matches postponed due to spike in COVID-19 cases

The AIFF said it arrived at the decision after an "internal discussion and communication with the clubs and state associations".

India

SC order allowing deportation of Rohingya migrants runs contrary to principles of human dignity

The ruling of the Supreme Court is reminiscent of the jurisprudential baggage that India has been carrying since partition

India

PSU banks may take hit of Rs 2,000 cr due to SC order on loan compound interest waiver

The apex court's judgment covers loans above Rs 2 crore, as loans less than the amount got blanket interest on interest waiver in November 2020