Disagreeing with govt can't be seditious, says SC; dismisses PIL demanding action against Farooq Abdullah

The top court was hearing a plea which referred to Abdullah's statement on restoring Article 370, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, and contended it clearly amounts to a seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under Section 124-A of the IPC

Press Trust of India March 03, 2021 21:22:54 IST
Disagreeing with govt can't be seditious, says SC; dismisses PIL demanding action against Farooq Abdullah

File image of Farooq Abdullah. ANI

New Delhi: Observing that expressing views that are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious, the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL seeking action against National Conference president Farooq Abdullah over his comments on abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution.

A bench of justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta rejected the plea and also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioners for making such claims.

"Expression of views which are different from the opinion of the government cannot be termed as seditious," the bench observed.

The top court was hearing a plea which referred to his statement on restoring Article 370, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, and contended it clearly amounts to a seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under Section 124-A of the IPC.

The petition, filed by Rajat Sharma and Dr Neh Srivastava from an organisation called the Vishwa Guru India Vision of Sardar Patel, alleged that the former chief minister is trying to "hand over" Kashmir to China and thus, he should be prosecuted for sedition.

"Mr Farooq Abdullah has committed an offence punishable under Section 124-A of Indian Penal Code. As he has made the live statement that for restoring Article 370 he would take help of China which clearly amount to seditious act and therefore he is liable to be punished under Section 124-A of the IPC," the plea stated.

The petitioners also referred to a statement made by BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra to claim that Abdullah is misleading the people of Jammu and Kashmir to join China for the restoration of Article 370 of the Constitution.

Updated Date:

also read

SC asks Centre for ‘national plan’ on oxygen, medicine supply as India registers world’s highest spike in COVID cases
India

SC asks Centre for ‘national plan’ on oxygen, medicine supply as India registers world’s highest spike in COVID cases

Delhi HC had earlier ordered the Centre to provide oxygen by whatever means to hospitals facing shortage, observing it 'seems human life is not important for the state'

SC order allowing deportation of Rohingya migrants runs contrary to principles of human dignity
India

SC order allowing deportation of Rohingya migrants runs contrary to principles of human dignity

The ruling of the Supreme Court is reminiscent of the jurisprudential baggage that India has been carrying since partition

'Absolutely frivolous': Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking to delete 26 verses of Quran
India

'Absolutely frivolous': Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking to delete 26 verses of Quran

The apex court has also imposed costs of Rs 50,000 on the petitioner, which was filed by former UP Shia Waqf Board chairman Waseem Rizvi