Delhi sealing drive: Centre to file reply in SC justifying law protecting unauthorised construction
Centre told the SC that it would submit a reply 'justifying' a special 2006 law which protects unauthorised construction from being sealed in Delhi.
New Delhi: The Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that it would submit a reply "justifying" a special 2006 law which protects unauthorised construction from being sealed in Delhi.
The Centre told a bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta that it had nothing to do with the sealing as it was for the municipal agencies in Delhi to look into it.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) AN S Nadkarni, representing the Centre, told the bench that entire documents of the case were not available and they would file an affidavit after looking into all the details.
"I have a draft but I have to see all the documents. I do not want to file a sketchy affidavit," Nadkarni said, adding, "We have nothing to do with the sealing. We are concerned with the law. Sealing is for the municipal agencies to look into".
Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, assisting the court as an amicus curiae in the matter, said the issue was of 2006 and it was strange that after 12 years, the Centre wants to file an affidavit.
To this, the bench observed, "According to Union of India, the Supreme Court is responsible for the delay". The bench, while asking the Centre to file a reply in three weeks, posted the matter for hearing on 2 April.
"The ASG says that he will collect the papers from the amicus and file an affidavit justifying the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006 within a period of three weeks from today. We make it clear that no further time will be granted," the bench noted in its order.
"For a proper management of the cases, we make it clear that we do not propose to hear any counsel on behalf of the petitioners. If there are any submissions that they wish to make, they may do so through the amicus. We will, of course, hear the Union of India, the DDA (Delhi Development Authority), the Delhi Government and the corporations," the bench said.
The bench would deal with the issue of validity of the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2006 and subsequent legislations.
The apex court had earlier said that the authorities do not appear to have carried out their statutory duties in preventing illegal construction in Delhi.
It had in December last year observed that rule of law over sanction to construct buildings has "completely broken down" in Delhi while expressing concern over rampant illegal construction.
The apex court had also ordered restoration of its 2006 monitoring committee to identify and seal such offending structures.
The monitoring committee, comprising KJ Rao, former advisor to the Election Commissioner, Bhure Lal, chairman, EPCA and Major General (Retd) Som Jhingan, was set up in 24 March, 2006, by the apex court.
The court had earlier said it had asked the committee not to seal any premises from 2012, expecting the authorities to carry out their statutory duties.
The West Bengal chief minister also urged Opposition parties to come together to defeat the BJP in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections
The top court had taken suo motu cognisance and said it cannot allow the UP government "to hold 100 percent physical Kanwar Yatra in view of COVID"
AAP's Punjab co-incharge Raghav Chadha took to Twitter to make the clarification, tagging a report on a possible tie-up between the two parties ahead of the Punjab Assembly polls