Delhi High Court rejects Virbhadra Singh's claims that FIR against him is 'political vendetta'

Delhi High Court on Friday refused to quash the disproportionate assets case filed by CBI against Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh and his wife, saying there is no basis to claim that the FIR is the result of any 'political vendetta'.

PTI March 31, 2017 18:44:44 IST
Delhi High Court rejects Virbhadra Singh's claims that FIR against him is 'political vendetta'

New Delhi: Delhi High Court on Friday refused to quash the disproportionate assets case filed by CBI against Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh and his wife, saying there is no basis to claim that the FIR is the result of any "political vendetta". It also vacated the Himachal Pradesh High Court's October 1, 2015 interim order restraining CBI from arresting, interrogating or filing a charge sheet in the case without the court's permission.

Delhi High Court rejects Virbhadra Singhs claims that FIR against him is political vendetta

Delhi High Court. AFP

"There is no factual basis brought on record to claim that the registration of the FIR against the petitioners (Singh and his wife) is actuated or legally or factually mala fide or that the registration of the FIR/ RC is a result of political vendetta," Justice Vipin Sanghi said. Following the order, the agency later in the day filed a charge sheet before the special court here against nine people including the 82-year-old Congress leader for alleged offences punishable under section 109 (abetment) of IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The special court has now fixed the charge sheet, running into over 500 pages, for consideration for Saturday. Commenting that the HP High Court's direction was passed without hearing the necessary parties in the matter, the Delhi High Court noted, "It is well settled that a court should not undertake to decide an issue unless it is a live issue between the parties".

It also turned down the question framed by HP High Court, whether the permission of the Speaker of the HP Legislative Assembly was mandatory before registration of FIR. Justice Sanghi held that there is "no legal basis to claim that the permission of Speaker of Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly was mandatory before registration of the FIR/RC in the case which pertains to the tenure of Virbhadra Singh while he was a Central minister under the Centre during the check period."

The court also turned down the chief minister's claim that the Delhi High Court has no jurisdiction, saying "accused cannot dictate to the prosecution that the case should be registered at a police station that he desires". "The case may be registered at any one of the police stations within whose jurisdiction the same can be legally instituted," it added.

Singh had sought directions from the court for quashing the FIR registered against him and his wife under Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 109 of IPC by the CBI on 23 September, 2015 here and urged the court to summon records of the preliminary inquiry and the FIR.

Updated Date:

also read

MJ Akbar files appeal against Priya Ramani's acquittal; Delhi HC says it will call for trial court records
India

MJ Akbar files appeal against Priya Ramani's acquittal; Delhi HC says it will call for trial court records

Akbar's appeal against Ramani's acquittal has been listed for hearing on 11 August.

COVID-19 crisis: Oxygen concentrators stuck at customs, says Delhi hospital; HC demands details from Centre
India

COVID-19 crisis: Oxygen concentrators stuck at customs, says Delhi hospital; HC demands details from Centre

However, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has informed the court that there is no consignment is pending with the customs authorities

'Do some homework': Delhi HC comes down heavily on 'publicity interest litigations', imposes costs
India

'Do some homework': Delhi HC comes down heavily on 'publicity interest litigations', imposes costs

A bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jasmeet Singh said some of the pleas appeared to be filed on ideas that came to the petitioners' minds while 'having tea or walking on the road'