Delhi HC refuses to intervene in odd-even car policy, terms PIL's 'premature'

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused to restrain the city government from enforcing its decision to allow even and odd number cars to ply in Delhi on alternative dates, saying the decision is on a “trial basis”. A division bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath refused to pass any order on two PILs against Delhi government’s a decision and posted the matters for 23 December. “It’s premature. Why are you filing these petitions? Delhi government is discussing this with groups of people. They will implement it from 1 January, 2016 on a trial basis. There is no policy/notification now. There is a proposal. You can’t use these PILs just to pressurise the government,” said the bench while adjourning the case. Appearing for the Delhi government, advocate Rahul Mehra opposed the pleas, saying the government has been discussing the issue with groups of people and the pleas should be dismissed. [caption id=“attachment_2539098” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]  File photo. Image courtesy: AFP[/caption] One PIL was filed by advocate Shweta Kapoor and the other by Sarvesh Singh. One of the PILs said the government announced its plan to restrict the number of cars on roads without first conducting a public debate and a study of the pros and cons of a system based on whether the registration number of a motor vehicle ends in an even or odd digit. It said the decision was  taken without considering the disturbing effect it would have on the public at large. To bring down the increasing air pollution level in the national capital, the Delhi government has decided that from 1 January, private vehicles would be allowed to run on the streets on alternate dates depending on whether their licence plates end in odd or even numbers. The plea said the government had not taken into consideration that there was a principle of ‘public will’ under the democratic system of governance and the same could be taken away by issuing such directions and restrictions. It also raised the question of women’s safety, saying the government had not been able to provide a safe public transport to women and that the decision was “unreasonable and arbitrary”. “Women feel safe driving their own vehicles back from their workplace after sundown or even late at night or engaging their own drivers where they have the paying capacity but now they will have to face the horrors on alternate days,” said the plea. It said the government had also ignored the differently-abled who used modified private vehicles and would not be able to use public transport. The plea also said that curtailing the movement of citizens on the basis of registration number of their vehicles would also leave several citizens stranded on every alternate day. “Curtailing the constitutional rights of the citizens by following unreasonable and arbitrary measures is only going to add to the chaos and shall not actually uproot the actual causes of pollution from the city which include pollution dust, entry of trucks inside the city of Delhi and traditional ways of waste disposal in the city,” it added. IANS