live

CBI vs CBI updates: No one shares our respect for institution, says CJI Gogoi after Alok Verma 'ignores' confidentiality request

CBI vs CBI LIVE updates: 'We expressed that highest degree of confidentiality should be maintained and this litigant takes the papers and shares it with everyone. Our respect for this institution is not shared by anyone for some strange reason', CJI Gogoi said.

FP Staff November 20, 2018 13:26:52 IST
Auto refresh feeds
CBI vs CBI updates: No one shares our respect for institution, says CJI Gogoi after Alok Verma 'ignores' confidentiality request

Highlights

LIVE NEWS and UPDATES

Nov 20, 2018 - 13:18 (IST)

CJI Gogoi became furious at his court masters for misplacing news report that 'quoted' Alok Verma's response

Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi had several occasions to lose his temper during the hearing on sidelined CBI director Alok Verma's plea. Amid the confusion over authorised and 'unauthorised' mentions in court yesterday, and the controversial media 'leak' of Verma's response to court, CJI was left fuming by his stenos. 

The court masters apparently could not find the copy of The Wire report kept aside to hand over to Verma's counsel. "The inefficiency in court number 1 is the highest," a miffed Gogoi said. However, the report was later found and handed over to Nariman. 

Nov 20, 2018 - 13:01 (IST)

Alok Verma's lawyers fight it out in court, one counsel contradicts other on seeking more time from SC

Alok Verma's lawyer were locked into an argument in court over seeking more time for filing of response on CVC report yesterday. Advocate on record and the other lawyer for Alok Verma Gopal Sankarnarayanan disputed their own senior counsel Fali S Nariman. Both lawyers claim that Alok Verma did authorise them to seek adjournment yesterday and that Nariman was wrong earlier when he said that Sankarnarayanan's mention in court was unauthorised.

To this, Nariman said that when a senior counsel is engaged no decision is taken without informing him. "I wasn't consulted before mentioning matter yesterday," he said.

Nov 20, 2018 - 12:34 (IST)

SC directs ire on Alok Verma for leaking confidential submissions

"We expressed that highest degree of confidentiality should be maintained and this litigant takes the papers and shares it with everyone. Our respect for this institution is not shared by anyone for some strange reason", CJI Gogoi said. 

Nov 20, 2018 - 12:27 (IST)

SC refuses to hear any submissions made by other lawyers, says it will only hear Nariman's PoV 

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, representing CVC in case, rose to make a submission but the Supreme Court denied to hear him. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, another of Verma's counsel, aslo  sought to clarify his stance but the Chief Justice refused to hear him as well

"Nobody is under any clout that they should seek clearance from us," the court said. The Supreme Court said it will listen to Nariman only. 

Nov 20, 2018 - 12:26 (IST)

SC hears Fali Nariman's reply on media leak

The Supreme Court started hearing Fali S Nariman's, Alok Verma's counsel, clarifictaions on the media leak of Alok Verma's confidential response to the Supreme Court. 

Nov 20, 2018 - 11:37 (IST)

SC agrees to hear Fali S Nariman's clarification on 'leak' later today

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Fali S Nariman's clarification at the end of the board today before the Supreme Court bench headed by CJI. 

Nov 20, 2018 - 11:30 (IST)

Fali S Nariman seeks time from SC to respond to alleged leak of Alok Verma's response 

Alok Verma's lawyer Fali S Nariman has sought more time from the Supreme Court to clarify the alleged leakage of his client Alok Verma's response which were to be submitted confidentially in court.

Nariman will also mention and clarify on lawyer Gopal Shankar Narayan's appearance in the case yesterday to seek more time on behalf of Verma. Nariman had expressed concern in court earlier today, saying neither he nor his client had authorised Narayan to seek more time on their behalf. 

Nov 20, 2018 - 11:27 (IST)

Media house that apparently reported on Alok Verma's 'confidential' response clarifies stand 

Online publication, The Wire, which apparently carried a report on Alok Verma's submissions to the Supreme Court has clarified it did not have access to the confidential response given by the sidelined CBI director. "This is to clarify that our stories were on Alok Verma’s responses to questions the CVC put to him. These were not in a sealed cover and were not meant for the SC. As for his response to CVC’s final report, handed over to SC in sealed cover, we haven’t seen/reported that," the media house tweeted. 

Nov 20, 2018 - 11:17 (IST)

Supreme Court refuses to officially record reason of adjournment of case

The Supreme Court refused to take on record the reason for adjournment of the hearing. "For reasons which the court is not  inclined to record", the hearing has been deferred, the Bench said. 

The matter will now be taken up next on 29 November.

Nov 20, 2018 - 11:03 (IST)

'What do we do when everyone is snooping' Alok Verma's counsel to SC

As Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi lost his temper after secretive contents of Alok Verma's response to the apex court were leaked, Fali S Nariman, Verma's lawyer, has responded saying, "What do we do with everyone snooping around and trying to get some information?"

CBI vs CBI LATEST Updates: "We expressed that highest degree of confidentiality should be maintained and this litigant takes the papers and shares it with everyone. Our respect for this institution is not shared by anyone for some strange reason", CJI Gogoi said.

The Supreme Court has started hearing Fali S Nariman's clarification to the media leak of Alok Verma's written submissions to the Supreme Court, which were supposed to be confidential. 

Alok Verma's lawyer Fali S Nariman has sought more time from the Supreme Court to clarify the alleged leakage of his client Alok Verma's response which were to be submitted confidentially in court. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Fali S Nariman's clarification at the end of the board today before the Supreme Court bench headed by CJI.

The Supreme Court refused to take on record the reason for adjournment of the hearing. "For reasons which the court is not inclined to record", the hearing has been deferred, the Bench said. The matter will now be taken up next on 29 November.

Miffed over the lack of confidentiality in Alok Verma's reply to the CVC, the Supreme Court has adjourned the hearing to 29 November. The apex court said, "Our efforts was to make sure individual officers are protected and so we asked for confidentiality. But we don't think any of you deserves a hearing."

The Supreme Court has deferred the hearing to 29 November. Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi was apparently miffed with the reported leaks from the CVC report, and some confusion over Alok Verma seeking more time to file his reponse yesterday. "None of you deserve a hearing today," an anguished Gogoi also said.

SC started hearing the CBI chief Alok Verma’s plea against the government’s decision to divest him of all charges. This comes barely a day after explosive claims were made by an officer against the National Security Adviser, a Union minister and the Central Vigilance Commissioner in the agency’s ongoing power tussle.

CBI vs CBI updates No one shares our respect for institution says CJI Gogoi after Alok Verma ignores confidentiality request

File image of CBI chief Alok Verma. News18

A top CBI official, Manish Kumar Sinha, on Monday moved the Supreme Court seeking a court-monitored SIT probe into the allegation of bribe against Special CBI Director Rakesh Asthana in the meat exporter Moin Qureshi case.

The petition refers to charges of bribe being made to a Union minister and the other accused claiming connections with the "high and mighty" in the power corridors, including National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval.

Sinha, a DIG-rank officer transferred to Nagpur on the dramatic night of October 23 when he was supervising the probe against Asthana, has said his transfer was "arbitrary, motivated and malafide".

The application challenging his transfer to Nagpur, refers to November 8, 2018 purported message from Andhra Pradesh cadre IAS officer Rekha Rani to the office of Sana Sathish Babu claiming Union Law Secretary Suresh Chandra, who was in London, wanted to speak to Sathish Babu to convey a message of Cabinet Secretary PK Sinha offering "full protection" to Sathish Babu.

Sathish Babu is a witness in the Moin Qureshi case and the meeting between Asthana and Chief Vigilence Commissioner (CVC) V.K. Chaudhary at latter's residence where matter relating to some transactions between Gorantla Ramesh, Sathish Babu and Moin Qureshi was discussed.

Seeking the top court direction for summoning of the records pertaining to the case against Asthana to ensure their safe custody and guard against tampering, Sinha in his application for impleadment has cited several instances where people who were interrogated in the case flaunted their high connections and one Manoj Prasad "dropped" the name of NSA Ajit Doval in the course of interrogation.

The payment of alleged illegal gratification involved a case against meat supplier Moin Qureshi. The accused in the case are Asthana, Deputy Superintendent of Police Devender Kumar, the investigating officer, two private persons Manoj Prasad and Somesh Prasad and unknown others.

The allegation of illegal gratification against Asthana, the application says, primarily pertained to December 2017 and October 2018. There are two instances of acceptance of bribe in December 2017 totalling to Rs 2.95 crore and three instances of acceptance of bribe in October 2018 totalling to around Rs 36 lakh.

This is a case in which Sathish Babu is a complainant who has recorded his complaint before a magistrate in Delhi.

Recalling the course of the events, Sinha in his application says that Manoj Prasad was intercepted at Delhi airport on his arrival from Dubai on the morning of October 16, 2018. He was brought to the CBI headquarters, where in the first few hours of his arrival, Manoj was "garrulous and arrogant, both at the same time, and in equal measure".

"He tried his best to ward off the investigation by dropping names of 'high and mighty' and mentioning his 'top contacts' to create fear in our mind," says the application.

Taking exception to CBI picking him from the airport, Manoj told the interrogators that his father Dineshwar Prasad "retired as Joint Secretary, RAW and has close acquaintance with present NSA Shri Ajit K. Doval."

Manoj Prasad also claimed that his brother Somesh Prasad was "very close to an officer at Dubai (name withheld) and to Samant Goel, presently Special Secretary, RAW and he can get us 'finished off/kicked out'."

The application says that no attempt was made to verify genuineness his claim about his closeness to NSA Doval.

In another revelation pointing to alleged close connections of the accused to the power corridors, the application says after the arrest of Manoj Prasad on the intervening night of October 16/17, in the morning of October 17 there was a call from Special Cell of Delhi Police to CBI Dy.SP A.K. Bassi, investigating the case but he did not take the call. Later, another Inspector of Special Cell called up and sought to know if Manoj had been arrested.

Enquiries revealed that the query had originated from the Cabinet Secretariat, says the application.

The application says that immediately after it became public that the arrest of Manoj Prasad in the intervening night of October 16 ad 17, there were "4 calls between Somesh and Samant Goel and 4 calls between Samant Goel and Shri Rakesh Asthana by 17th afternoon".

Manoj also claimed that he and his contact Samant Goel "helped NSA Shri Ajit Doval on an important personal matter". He further claimed that India opted out of a contest for a post in the Interpol.

Sinha says that on verification it was found to be correct.

India was to contest for the post of delegate in Interpol and CBI Joint Director (Policy) AK Sharma was its nominee. There were four other contending countries. The elections were to be held sometime in the third week of November this year. Sometime in September, Sharma was to go abroad for a meeting but at the last minute, his trip was abruptly cancelled.

Meanwhile, CBI Director Alok Verma on Monday filed his reply to the adverse findings against him by the CVC after the anti-corruption watchdog inquired into the allegations of corruption levelled against him by his second in command Special Dirtector Rakesh Asthana.

With inputs from agencies

Updated Date:

also read

SC declines Shree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust’s plea to exempt it from audit of 25 yrs
India

SC declines Shree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust’s plea to exempt it from audit of 25 yrs

A bench headed by Justice UU Lalit said the audit should be completed as early as possible, preferably within three months.

Abetment involves mental process of 'instigating a person' in doing something, declares Supreme Court
India

Abetment involves mental process of 'instigating a person' in doing something, declares Supreme Court

"Abetment involves the mental process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding a person in doing a thing," said bench comprising Justices R Subhash Reddy and Hrishikesh Roy.

Dhanbad judge deliberately hit by autorickshaw driver, CBI tells Jharkhand High Court
India

Dhanbad judge deliberately hit by autorickshaw driver, CBI tells Jharkhand High Court

The 49-year-old judge died after a three-wheeler knocked him down while he was out for his morning jog. The video of the incident soon went viral on social media