CBI vs CBI: Deputy SP Ashwini Kumar Gupta moves Supreme Court challenging transfer to Intelligence Bureau
CBI Deputy SP Ashwini Kumar Gupta, in his plea, said he had joined the IB in January 1999 and inducted on deputation to the CBI in July 2014, initially for three years, till June 2017.
Delhi: Amidst the ongoing feud inside the premier investigation agency, another Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officer has moved the Supreme Court challenging his repatriation to the Intelligence Bureau (IB), terming it "unjustified" and "malafide".
Deputy SP Ashwini Kumar Gupta has alleged that he was repatriated to his parent Intelligence Bureau (IB) cadre as he was investigating various corruption charges against CBI Special Director Rakesh Asthana, who has been divested of his duties and sent on leave along with CBI Director Alok Kumar Verma.
Gupta, in his plea, said he had joined the IB in January 1999 and inducted on deputation to the CBI in July 2014, initially for three years, till June 2017.
Subsequently, he was granted one year extension in the CBI till June 2018 after a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from his parent department.
"CBI wrote to IB seeking NOC again for further extension of the tenure of the Applicant in CBI till June 2019. The IB in June 2018 again gave NOC for further extension of the tenure of the applicant, which was forwarded by the CBI to the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) in June 2018 itself for its approval as per the procedural requirement, which is presently under process," the plea stated.
The officer claimed that "surprisingly", on the morning of 24 October, 2018, the CBI repatriated him to his parent organisation on the ground that the order of his extension had not been received by the CBI.
"Whereas the fact of the matter is that the NOC from IB was received by the CBI in June 2018 before expiry of the deputation of the applicant and was forwarded to DoPT for their approval in the same month," Gupta said.
He said "singling out" of the applicant was due to the fact that he was one of the officials carrying out investigation, along with another officer AK Bassi, which led to the unearthing of crucial findings, as well as implicating Asthana in the Sterling Biotech case registered on 30 August, 2017.
The officer said he along with Bassi, who has been transferred to Port Blair, visited Vadodara on 7 October, 2018 and conducted the probe till 13 October.
"The gist of the findings of the inquiry conducted at Vadodara...led to the establishment of 'undeniable, cogent, clear and unmistakable' link of Asthana and his family with fugitive accused Nitin and Chetan Sandesara, and that infuriated Asthana so much that he made a mention of the same in his complaint to the Cabinet Secretary on 18 October," he said.
Asthana has levelled corruption allegations against Verma.
Gupta termed his repatriation as "motivated" and "malafide", urging the court to quash it.
Both Bassi and Gupta have filed applications seeking to intervene in the pending petition filed by Verma, who had approached the apex court challenging the Centre's decision to divest him of his duties and sending him on leave following his feud with Asthana.
Pursuant to the top court's order, the Central Vigilance Commission's inquiry against Verma was conducted under the supervision of former apex court judge Justice AK Patnaik. The report was filed in the court on 12 November.
'Every journalist entitled to protection': SC quashes sedition case against Vinod Dua citing a 1962 judgment
While upholding the validity of section 124A (sedition) of the IPC in the Kedarnath Singh vs State of Bihar case, the top court had ruled the sedition charges could not be invoked against a citizen for criticism of government actions
COVID-19 updates: SC questions vaccine procurement policy; Mumbai eases restrictions, India logs 1.52 lakh cases
Meanwhile, the Centre told states and Union territories that nearly 12 crore COVID vaccine doses will be available to them in June 2021, thus enabling them to ramp up inoculation
COVID-19 vaccine: SC questions Centre over policy of mandatory registration on CoWIN, flags 'digital divide'
The apex court bench headed by DY Chandrachud also stated that the policy makers must have an 'ear to the ground' and make the process accessible to all