Bombay HC starts hearing constitutional challenges to provisions of RERA
The Bombay High Court on Monday began hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday began hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).
A bench of Justices Naresh Patil and Rajesh Ketkar is going to hear the matter on a daily basis.
Real estate developers including DB Realty, MIG (Bandra) Realtors and Builders along with several individual land owners had moved the court.
The petitioners have questioned, among other things, the provisions that mandate that all ongoing projects be registered with the authority set up under the new act, and provide stringent penal action to ensure that projects are completed within fixed time.
They have also challenged the provision which says that a plot owner who sells the plot to builder will be considered a co-promoter of the project when it comes to fixing the liability.
The petitions claimed that the Act, and the constitution of a state-level authority for its implementation, were arbitrary, and therefore unconstitutional.
In September, after several petitions challenging RERA were filed in high courts across the country, the Supreme Court stayed the proceedings in other courts and suggested that the Bombay High Court hear its RERA cases first.
Other courts should wait for the Bombay High Court's decision before hearing RERA-related matters, it said, while directing the high court here to expedite the hearings.
Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.
School fees during lockdown: Parents from different states move Supreme Court, seek moratorium on dues
Parents of the school going children who have moved the top court hail from Rajasthan, Odisha, Punjab, Gujarat, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Delhi and Maharashtra.
SC asks Centre if individual orders cancelling visas were served to foreign attendees of Tablighi Jamaat meet; matter posted for 2 July
Thirty-four foreigners from 15 countries, who had attended the Tablighi Jamaat meet in March, approached the Supreme Court claiming they were not issued individual orders regarding blacklisting and FIRs
In a landmark verdict on 17 February, the top court had directed that women officers in the army be granted permanent commission and command postings