Bombay HC says imposing four-day meat ban in Mumbai not feasible, seeks state govt response

Bombay HC says imposing four-day meat ban in Mumbai not feasible, seeks state govt response

FP Archives September 11, 2015, 08:28:35 IST

The Bombay High Court on Thursday said imposing a ban on animal slaughter and sale of meat for four days during the Jain festival ‘Paryushan’ is not feasible in a metropolitan city like Mumbai and sought response from the state and the municipal body on a petition challenging it.

Advertisement
Bombay HC says imposing four-day meat ban in Mumbai not feasible, seeks state govt response

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Thursday said imposing a ban on animal slaughter and sale of meat for four days during the Jain festival ‘Paryushan’ is not feasible in a metropolitan city like Mumbai and sought response from the state and the municipal body on a petition challenging it.

Bombay High Court. IBNLive

A division bench headed by Justice Anoop Mohta was hearing a petition filed by Bombay Mutton Dealers Association challenging Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation’s (BMC) decision to ban the sale of meat for four days–10, 13, 17 and 18 September–during the festival.

Advertisement

While the ban on 10 and 17 September was as per government’s directives, the Shiv Sena-BJP run BMC imposed it on 13 and 18. The ban covers only the sale of mutton and chicken.

“Mumbai is a metropolitan city. Such straight ban on meat cannot be a formula. Ban is on slaughter and sale of the meat. What about other sources? What about packaged meat that is already available in the market?” the court asked.

The court suggested if the Jain community had a problem with animals being slaughtered in the open and displayed in shops, a direction can be issued against it.

The court posted the matter for hearing on Friday and asked the state government and BMC to file short affidavits.

The court also sought to know from the civic body under which provision of law it imposed such a ban.

Advertisement

The petitioners have claimed that the decision is unconstitutional as it affects the livelihood of a section of people and favours a small percentage of population. It also goes against the secular fabric of the constitution, they have said.

PTI

Written by FP Archives

see more

Latest News

Find us on YouTube

Subscribe

Top Shows

Vantage First Sports Fast and Factual Between The Lines