Better to not live in Delhi, it is like a gas chamber, says Supreme Court; asks govt what needs to be done 'in actuality' to curb pollution

The Supreme Court also expressed its despair over the lack of implementation of measures to curb air pollution and traffic congestion in the capital

Press Trust of India January 18, 2019 19:00:26 IST
Better to not live in Delhi, it is like a gas chamber, says Supreme Court; asks govt what needs to be done 'in actuality' to curb pollution
  • A bench of justices Mishra and Deepak Gupta said these problems affect the right to life

  • Advocate Aparajita Singh, assisting the court as an amicus curiae, told the bench that Delhi has become a "gas chamber"

  • The Supreme Court also said that many polluting vehicles enter Delhi at night

New Delhi: It is better not to be in Delhi, the Supreme Court said on Friday, expressing its despair over the lack of implementation of measures to curb air pollution and traffic congestion in the capital which, it added, has become like a "gas chamber".

"In the morning and evening, there is so much pollution and traffic congestion," Justice Arun Mishra said, hearing a matter related to air pollution in the National Capital Region.

Better to not live in Delhi it is like a gas chamber says Supreme Court asks govt what needs to be done in actuality to curb pollution

Representational image. AP

"It is better not to be in Delhi. I do not wish to settle in Delhi. It is difficult to live in Delhi," he said.

A bench of justices Mishra and Deepak Gupta said these problems affect the right to life.

Justice Mishra cited an example to explain the problem of traffic, saying he was stuck in traffic on Friday morning and could have missed the swearing-in of two judges at the apex court.

Advocate Aparajita Singh, assisting the court as an amicus curiae, told the bench that Delhi has become a "gas chamber" due to pollution. And Justice Gupta agreed, "Yes, it is like gas chamber."

Singh told the court that authorities always say they take measures to curb pollution but the reality is different. "We would like to understand," the bench said.

"What are the things which are required to be done in actuality? What remains to be done as per the comprehensive action plan? What is required to keep in check environment pollution in Delhi? What more can be done?" it said, adding, "implementation is definitely lacking".

It said that many polluting vehicles enter Delhi at night and asked authorities how they were allowing these to enter the national capital.

The court asked the Delhi Police what action they have taken to remove unclaimed vehicles that are no longer required in legal cases from police stations. It also asked the Delhi government why they have not appointed district 'nazir' (record keeper of record-room).

Delhi government's counsel told it they are yet to receive a reply from Delhi Development Authority for allotment of land to build malkhana (record room).

"If you can dispose of the junk vehicles, you will get several acres of land," the bench said.

The court posted the matter for further hearing on 1 February.

Updated Date:

also read

SC to continue hearing PIL on Delhi's air pollution today; city's AQI records significant improvement
India

SC to continue hearing PIL on Delhi's air pollution today; city's AQI records significant improvement

On Wednesday, for the first time in the last 10 days, the air quality in the city has shown significant improvement from the "very poor" to the "poor" category, according to SAFAR

Delhi's air quality continues to remain in 'very poor' category with overall AQI of 372
India

Delhi's air quality continues to remain in 'very poor' category with overall AQI of 372

Delhi has reimposed ban on construction and demolition activities following the Supreme Court's directions and extended the ban on entry of trucks till 30 November

Supreme Court irked over ONGC's approach to arbitration, asks AG to resolve
India

Supreme Court irked over ONGC's approach to arbitration, asks AG to resolve

The former judge, in the letter, said, I find it embarrassing to continue as a member of the Tribunal and the Claimant can't alone be asked to pay a fee decided by the Tribunal