Ayodhya land dispute: No hearing in Supreme Court due to unavailability of constitution bench judge SA Bobde

The hearing in the politically sensitive Ayodhya land dispute case could not take place in the SC due to unavailability of one of the five judges of the Constitution Bench.

Press Trust of India August 19, 2019 11:55:16 IST
Ayodhya land dispute: No hearing in Supreme Court due to unavailability of constitution bench judge SA Bobde
  • The hearing in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case could not take place in the SC due to unavailability of one of the five judges

  • The Constitution bench headed by Ranjan Gogoi was scheduled to hear arguments of senior lawyer CS Vaidyanathan, representing deity 'Ram Lalla Virajman', for the eighth day

  • Minutes before the commencement of the hearing, lawyers on both sides were told by the court staff that Justice SA Bobde was unavailable today

New Delhi: The hearing in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case could not take place in the Supreme Court on Monday due to unavailability of one of the five judges of the Constitution Bench.

Ayodhya land dispute No hearing in Supreme Court due to unavailability of constitution bench judge SA Bobde

Representational image. Reuters

The Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi was scheduled to hear arguments of senior lawyer CS Vaidyanathan, representing deity 'Ram Lalla Virajman', for the eighth day.

Minutes before the commencement of the hearing, lawyers on both sides were told by the court staff that Justice SA Bobde was unavailable today.

Besides CJI and Justice Bobde, justices DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer are part of the bench which is hearing the appeal in the case.

On Friday, Vaidyanathan had told the court that a "massive" temple of Lord Ram, dating back to the second century BC (Before Christ), existed at the disputed site in Ayodhya before the construction of Babri Masjid.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre disputed land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and 'Ram Lalla Virajman'.

Babri Masjid was demolished by right-wing activists on 6 December, 1992 in Ayodhya, leading to the protracted legal battle.

Updated Date:

also read

CJI Ranjan Gogoi says delivering Ayodhya verdict in four weeks will be 'miraculous', reiterates 18 Oct deadline to Hindu, Muslim parties
India

CJI Ranjan Gogoi says delivering Ayodhya verdict in four weeks will be 'miraculous', reiterates 18 Oct deadline to Hindu, Muslim parties

The Supreme Court on Thursday said that it cannot grant even a single extra day beyond 18 October to all petitioners to complete their submissions in the Ayodhya land dispute case

Ayodhya case in Supreme Court: Muslim petitioner calls daily hearings 'torture', cites lack of time to prepare case; CJI rejects objection
India

Ayodhya case in Supreme Court: Muslim petitioner calls daily hearings 'torture', cites lack of time to prepare case; CJI rejects objection

The Supreme Court on the fourth day of hearing in the Ayodhya case, rejected the Muslim party's objection to daily hearing of the matter.

Ayodhya case in SC: Bench demands 'objective' documentary evidence on existence of Ram temple after Hindu parties argue based on religious texts
India

Ayodhya case in SC: Bench demands 'objective' documentary evidence on existence of Ram temple after Hindu parties argue based on religious texts

The ninth day of the Ayodhya case hearing in the Supreme Court progressed with the advocate for Ram Lalla Virajman, CS Vaidyanathan, continuing his arguments on behalf of the deity.