The Supreme Court special bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi on Friday adjourned the hearing of the petitions challenging the scrapping of Article 370 due to the pleas being “defective” on technical aspects. The petitions are likely to be listed for next week, and the petitioners have been asked to “fix” the technical mistakes in their petitions. [caption id=“attachment_6604251” align=“alignleft” width=“380”] Representational image. Reuters[/caption] A special bench, comprising
Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SA Bobde and SA Nazeer was hearing two petitions relating to the crisis in Kashmir that began over 10 days ago. One petition, filed by advocate ML Sharma, challenges Centre’s decision to scrap provisions of Article 370. The other was by Anuradha Bhasin, executive editor of Kashmir Times, who sought the removal of restrictions on the media in Jammu and Kashmir. Gogoi, during the hearing of
advocate ML Sharma’s petition challenging the abrogation of Article 370, berated the lawyer’s petition for being “poorly drafted”. “What is this petition? This is simply not maintainable. What kind of petition is this?” Gogoi questioned Sharma. “I read your petition for half an hour but could not understand what is this petition about,” he added. Responding to the plea by Anuradha Bhasin on media restrictions in the Valley, Justice SA Bobde said, " Landlines are working, I spoke to the chief justice this morning."
#JammuAndKashmir: Court now hearing petition by Kashmir Times seeking lifting of restrictions on communication shutdown.
— Bar and Bench (@barandbench) August 16, 2019
CJI remarks "we would like to give it some time"
Launching a sharp attack for “defective” petitions challenging the abrogation of the Article 370, the CJI said that of six petitions filed on the issue, four had “defects that are yet to be cured”. Demanding an answer on why defective petitions were being filed in a politically and socially sensitive issue, Gogoi said, “We accommodate you in between Ayodhya hearing and this is what we get in return.” _Follow LIVE updates on Kashmir here_ After the apex court adjourned the hearing on Kashmir saying, the matter on media restrictions along with other connected issues will be taken up on a later date, senior advocate Vrinda Grover, appearing for the journalist was quoted by
NDTV as saying, “Communication blackout in Kashmir has hampered reporting from the state. Freedom of movement for media has been hampered. We have asked the Supreme Court to help restore minimum restoration of communication at least for media personnel.”


)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
