SC on Article 370 abrogation: Apex court says 'five-judge bench competent to hear case', turns down pleas to move matter to larger bench

A number of petitions have been filed in the apex court against the abrogation of Article 370 including those of private individuals, lawyers, activists and political parties and they have also challenged the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.

Press Trust of India March 02, 2020 11:10:04 IST
SC on Article 370 abrogation: Apex court says 'five-judge bench competent to hear case', turns down pleas to move matter to larger bench
  • The judgment was delivered by a Constitution Bench of Justices NV Ramana, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, R Subhash Reddy, BR Gavai and Surya Kant after the order on the issue was reserved on 23 January.

  • Opposing the plea, the Centre had said that abrogation of provisions of Article 370 has become a 'fait accompli' leaving sole option to accept the change.

  • NGO People's Union of Civil Liberties, Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association and an intervenor have sought referring the matter to a larger bench.

Saying that a five-judge bench is "competent enough to hear the case", the Supreme Court on Monday refused to refer the matter concerning the Centre's 5 August, 2019 decision revoking the special status of Jammu and Kashmir to a larger bench.

The judgment was delivered by a Constitution Bench of Justices NV Ramana, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, R Subhash Reddy, BR Gavai and Surya Kant after the order on the issue was reserved on 23 January.

NGO People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association and an intervenor had sought referring the matter to a larger bench.

The petitioners had sought reference to a larger bench on the ground that two judgments of apex court – Prem Nath Kaul versus Jammu and Kashmir in 1959 and Sampat Prakash versus Jammu and Kashmir in 1970 – which dealt with the issue of Article 370 are in direct conflict and therefore the current bench of five judges could not hear the issue.

After hearing arguments on the issue, the apex court had remarked that the case would only be referred to a larger bench if it finds major contradictions in the two judgments, as claimed by the petitioners.

Opposing the plea, the Centre had said that abrogation of provisions of Article 370, which granted special status to erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, has become a "fait accompli" leaving sole option to accept the change.

SC on Article 370 abrogation Apex court says fivejudge bench competent to hear case turns down pleas to move matter to larger bench

File image of the Supreme Court. AP

Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, had told the bench – also comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, R Subhash Reddy, BR Gavai and Surya Kant – that "the abrogation of provisions of Article 370, has now become a "fait accompli" leaving sole option to accept the change".

Referring to the two earlier judgments, Venugopal had said that they were not related to each other and dealt with different issues. He had said that the verdict in Prem Nath Kaul versus Jammu and Kashmir did not deal with Article 370, rather with the question whether the Maharaja had the legislative power or not.

While referring to the verdict in Sampat Prakash versus Jammu and Kashmir, Venugopal had said though it dealt with some aspects of Article 370, it was not in direct conflict with the verdict in the Kaul case and therefore the present issue should not be referred to a larger bench.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Jammu and Kashmir administration, had said he adopts the arguments of the Attorney General and favours no reference to larger bench.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for Jammu and Kashmir People's Conference, had said that he is supporting Centre on the question that no reference is needed to a larger bench.

A number of petitions have been filed in the apex court including those of private individuals, lawyers, activists and political parties and they have also challenged the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which splits Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

With inputs from PTI

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Pulwama-type attack averted in Jammu and Kashmir, 52 kilograms of explosives recovered near highway, says Indian Army
India

Pulwama-type attack averted in Jammu and Kashmir, 52 kilograms of explosives recovered near highway, says Indian Army

The explosives were found in a Syntex water tank at Gadikal's Karewa area during a search operation around 8 am

'Litany of falsehoods': India slams Pakistan after Imran Khan rakes up Jammu and Kashmir issue at UNGA
India

'Litany of falsehoods': India slams Pakistan after Imran Khan rakes up Jammu and Kashmir issue at UNGA

The First Secretary in India's Permanent Mission to the UN, Mijito Vinito, walked out of the general assembly hall when Imran Khan started his diatribe about India

Three days after asking J&K Police for help on Twitter, advocate Babar Qadri shot dead at Srinagar home
India

Three days after asking J&K Police for help on Twitter, advocate Babar Qadri shot dead at Srinagar home

The advocate, who used to appear on TV debates and write opinion pages for local newspapers, was rushed to the SKIMS Hospital where he was declared dead on arrival