Anti-Sikh riots: HC seeks CBI reply on Sajjan Kumar's plea

The CBI had said as per the provisions of the Commission of Inquiry Act, the affidavits and statements of a witness given before any commission cannot be used against her for the purpose of questioning her testimony.

hidden June 13, 2012 14:44:40 IST
Anti-Sikh riots: HC seeks CBI reply on Sajjan Kumar's plea

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court today asked the CBI to reply to Congress leader Sajjan Kumar's petition against a trial court's order which had dismissed his plea to let him use a 1984 anti-Sikh riots victim's statements to the judicial commissions in past to defend himself.

"You file a short reply to the petition," Justice SP Garg said and fixed the matter for further hearing on 3 July.

Justice Garg said that there was no urgency to rush to the high court during the vacation as the trial judge has fixed the matter for hearing on 13 July.

AntiSikh riots HC seeks CBI reply on Sajjan Kumars plea

The Delhi High Court today asked the CBI to reply to Congress leader Sajjan Kumar's petition. AFP

Kumar's plea was dismissed on 2 June by the trial court which had said the witness Jagdish Kaur's statements to the judicial commissions cannot be used for any purpose, including that for discrediting her testimony or to impeach her.

The Congress leader, in his plea, had said the affidavits and statements of the complainant and key witness Jagdish Kaur, given earlier to the judicial commissions that probed the riots, should be allowed to be used to confront her with her recent testimony in the ongoing trial.

The former Delhi MP had filed an application saying the CBI prosecutor RS Cheema on 12 July, 2010 had told the court that Jagdish Kaur's affidavits and statement to GT Nanavati and Ranganath Mishra Commissions, cannot be used because of contradictions.

The CBI had said as per the provisions of the Commission of Inquiry Act, the affidavits and statements of a witness given before any commission cannot be used against her for the purpose of questioning her testimony.

According to Kumar, if the prosecution and the witness would use the affidavits filed before Ranganath Commission and Nanavati Commission, then there is no law which forbids the defence from confronting them.

PTI

Updated Date:

also read

Plea in Supreme Court seeks to restrain Centre from implementing Sachar Committee report
India

Plea in Supreme Court seeks to restrain Centre from implementing Sachar Committee report

The petition claims that the appointment of the panel was made in violation of Article 77, which states that every executive action or order of the Central government has to be taken or issued in the name of the President, and hence unconstitutional and illegal

Juhi Chawla withdraws Delhi HC plea over dismissal of lawsuit against 5G wireless network
Entertainment

Juhi Chawla withdraws Delhi HC plea over dismissal of lawsuit against 5G wireless network

Chawla had moved the application seeking that her lawsuit against 5G rollout be declared “rejected” instead of “dismissed”.