Amethi candidate challenges Rahul Gandhi's affidavit, raises questions on citizenship; BJP asks Congress chief to 'come clean'
Amethi's returning officer Ram Manohar Misra told reporters that Rahul's counsel had sought time to reply to the objections and has been asked to do so by Monday
An Independent candidate Saturday raised objections over Congress president Rahul Gandhi's nomination from Amethi
BJP spokesperson GVL Narasimha Rao said it is "stunning" that Rahul's lawyer sought time to reply to the objections
Referring to the complaint, the BJP spokesperson said there are "discrepancies and attempts to suppress facts" in Rahul's affidavits
Amethi/New Delhi: An Independent candidate Saturday raised objections over Congress president Rahul Gandhi's nomination from Amethi, alleging discrepancies over citizenship and educational qualifications in his election affidavit. Citing the complaint, the BJP said in New Delhi asked Rahul to "come clean" on the matter. Complainant Dhruv Lal's lawyer Ravi Prakash showed reporters purported copies of a certificate of incorporation of a UK-registered company in which the Congress leader is stated to be a British national.
Amethi's returning officer Ram Manohar Misra told reporters that Rahul's counsel had sought time to reply to the objections and has been asked to do so by Monday. Ravi Prakash claimed that the UK Company had existed for five years and would have made some profit, but that has not been disclosed in the affidavit. He told reporters that he has urged the returning officer to look into this aspect.
The Independent candidate's counsel said he has sought a clarification on Rahul's citizenship as being a UK citizen would bar him from fighting the Lok Sabha elections. Yogendra Misra, the president of the district Congress unit, said the objections will be countered legally on Monday. Uttar Pradesh's chief electoral officer L Venkateshwar Lu said he has sought information on the complaint from the district election authorities.
In Delhi, BJP spokesperson GVL Narasimha Rao said it is "stunning" that Rahul's lawyer sought time to reply to the objections. "These are serious allegations. Is Rahul Gandhi an Indian citizen or not? Did he ever become a British citizen? He should come out with the real story," he told reporters. Election Commission sources said the returning officer is the final authority on such a matter, but he cannot check the veracity of what is submitted in an election affidavit.
If anyone has an objection to what is recorded in an affidavit, the person should approach the court, they said. The BJP spokesperson claimed that a British company, in which Rahul had said in 2004 that he made investments, had made a submission that year to the authorities there that he was a British citizen. Referring to the complaint, the BJP spokesperson said there are "discrepancies and attempts to suppress facts" in Rahul's affidavits filed during different elections from 2004 to 2014.
The Congress chief had said that he did M Phil in development economics from Cambridge University, but later claimed it was in development studies, Rao alleged. The BJP spokesman said inquiries show that one Rahul Vincy and not Rahul Gandhi got the degree that particular year. "We will like to know if Rahul Gandhi goes by multiple names in different countries," Rao said.
He also wondered if the Gandhi scion's qualifications were like Congress manifestos that change every five years.
India's COVID-19 crisis: Flat-footed communication strategy, risk-averse bureaucracy add to distress
An unsavoury controversy erupted this week when foreign embassies reached out to India’s opposition party for critical medical equipment via social media
The AINRC has won ten seats, while the BJP has won six seats. In the UPA camp, the DMK won six constituencies, while the Congress won in two places
West Bengal polls: How Mamata Banerjee's Nandigram daredevilry led TMC from near-collapse to sweeping the state
With all leaders who could pull others with them gone, this victory has placed Mamata Banerjee in a safe seat to rule the state