2012 New Delhi gangrape case: Supreme Court reserves its verdict on review plea filed by death row convict

The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on a plea by death row convict Mukesh Singh seeking review of the top court judgment upholding his death sentence in the 16 December, 2012, New Delhi gangrape case

IANS December 13, 2017 08:57:00 IST
2012 New Delhi gangrape case: Supreme Court reserves its verdict on review plea filed by death row convict

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on a plea by death row convict Mukesh Singh seeking review of the top court judgment upholding his death sentence in the 16 December, 2012, New Delhi gangrape case.

The bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice R Banumathi and Justice Ashok Bhushan reserved the verdict as advocate Manohar Lal Sharma cited procedural lapses committed by police in the course of the investigation and raised doubts about the DNA report.

2012 New Delhi gangrape case Supreme Court reserves its verdict on review plea filed by death row convict

Representational image. AP

Sharma said his client was tortured even when the trial was on.

The bench rejected Sharma's submission that even the top court had doubted the DNA report in the course of the hearing of the appeals against Delhi High Court verdict upholding the death sentence.

"We never said (that). We maintained a strict silence (in the course of the hearing of the appeals). You are not correct in saying that any one of us on the bench doubted the veracity of the DNA report," Chief Justice Misra said, brushing aside his submission.

Senior counsel Sidharth Luthra, appearing for the Delhi government, told the court that all the submissions made before the court do not call for a review of the 5 May verdict as all these submissions have already been considered and rejected by the trial court, the high court and the Supreme Court.

Rebutting the submission that Mukesh was tortured even when the trial was on, Luthra told the court that during the period of trial, he was in judicial custody and the investigating officer had no access to him.

"If you have a right and you consciously did not choose to exercise it, then you can't later use it to castigate the trial court, high court and other forums," he said.

The top court by its 5 May verdict had upheld the death sentence of Mukesh Singh, Pawan Gupta, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Thakur.

The four were convicted for raping and assaulting the 23-year-old paramedical student inside a moving bus on 16 December, 2012, which led to her death due to internal injuries 13 days later in a Singapore hospital.

After committing the crime, the accused, six in all, dumped the girl and her boyfriend on the side of a road. Some onlookers alerted the police. The sheer brutality of the crime led to nationwide revulsion — and street protests.

A fifth accused, Ram Singh, committed suicide in the Tihar Central Jail. The sixth, a juvenile, who was accused of ripping apart the woman's intestines, was sent to a correction home and has been released after serving his probation period.

The court permitted the lawyer for other three death row convicts — Gupta, Sharma and Thakur — to file their plea for the review as it it directed the next hearing on 29 January.

Updated Date:

also read

CLAT 2021: SC dismisses plea seeking to postpone law entrance test slated for 23 July
India

CLAT 2021: SC dismisses plea seeking to postpone law entrance test slated for 23 July

The apex court also uplifted the rule where the General Body of the Consortium of National Law Universities on 12 June had asked all students to get vaccinated before appearing for the exam

Plea in Supreme Court seeks to restrain Centre from implementing Sachar Committee report
India

Plea in Supreme Court seeks to restrain Centre from implementing Sachar Committee report

The petition claims that the appointment of the panel was made in violation of Article 77, which states that every executive action or order of the Central government has to be taken or issued in the name of the President, and hence unconstitutional and illegal

NEET MDS 2020: Counselling for students to begin virtually within a month
India

NEET MDS 2020: Counselling for students to begin virtually within a month

The Supreme Court had been informed by the Centre that the counselling for NEET-MDS 2020 will be conducted as per existing reservation policies or norms