Cricket

Sourav Ganguly all set to continue as BCCI president for another term after SC accepts amendment to board's constitution

Supreme court do away with the three-year cooling-off period; allowing Sourav Ganguly and Jay Shah a shot at six-year tenure (two terms of three years each) at a stretch as BCCI president and secretary respectively

Sourav Ganguly all set to continue as BCCI president for another term after SC accepts amendment to board's constitution

Sourav Ganguly in a file photo.

Sourav Ganguly and Jay Shah are all set to continue as BCCI president and secretary respectively for another term as the Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the BCCI to wave off its mandatory cooling-off period. As per its current constitution, a BCCI or any state association office bearer shall not be eligible to contest an election for a consecutive term without completing a cooling-off period of three years.

However, the new amendment accepted by the Supreme Court, benched by Justices DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli, allows an office bearer to serve as a BCCI member for two terms despite serving two terms with a state body.

This means both Ganguly and Shah are eligible to serve BCCI for six years at a stretch while a cricket official can stretch up to 12 years (six of them with the state association first).

The bench said that an office bearer can serve on a particular post for two consecutive terms, both at the BCCI and the State Association level, after which he would have to serve three years cooling-off period.

“The purpose of the cooling-off period is not to create undesirable monopolies”, the bench said.

The top court’s order came on the Board’s plea seeking to amend its constitution concerning the tenure of its office bearers including its President Sourav Ganguly and Secretary Jay Shah by doing away with the mandatory cooling-off period between tenures of office bearers across state cricket associations and the BCCI.

The BCCI, in its proposed amendment, has sought the abolition of a cooling-off period for its office bearers which would enable Ganguly and Shah to continue in office as president and secretary despite them having completed six years at respective state cricket associations.

Earlier, the Justice RM Lodha-led committee had recommended reforms in the BCCI which have been accepted by the top court.

The constitution of the BCCI, which was earlier approved by the top court, stipulates a mandatory three-year cooling-off period for anyone who had served two consecutive terms of three years each in the state cricket association or the BCCI.

While Ganguly was an office bearer in the Cricket Association of Bengal, Shah had served in the Gujarat Cricket Association.

With inputs from PTI

Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News, India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Updated Date: September 14, 2022 17:57:47 IST

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Andhra HC cannot be 'town planner', says SC on high court order for building state capital in six months
India

Andhra HC cannot be 'town planner', says SC on high court order for building state capital in six months

A bench of Justices KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna also stayed time-bound directions issued by the high court, including the one that said the state will construct and develop Amaravati capital city and capital region within six months

SC stays NGT orders imposing fines on NOIDA authority, Delhi Jal Board over untreated sewage
India

SC stays NGT orders imposing fines on NOIDA authority, Delhi Jal Board over untreated sewage

The supreme court stayed the National Green Tribunal order imposing a fine of Rs 100 crore on NOIDA for failing to prevent untreated sewage from flowing into the Kondli irrigation canal, and a Rs 50 crore fine on the Delhi Jal Board for the release of untreated sewage in the Yamuna

Supreme Court asks Centre to respond on pleas seeking recognition of same sex marriages
India

Supreme Court asks Centre to respond on pleas seeking recognition of same sex marriages

The pleas seek direction seeking recognition of the marriage of two gay couples under the Special Marriage Act