Is Russia secretly building a spy base in Kaliningrad at Nato’s doorstep?

Fresh satellite imagery and open-source analysis point to the development of a sprawling intelligence complex that could represent one of the most significant electronic surveillance installations in Europe, in Russia’s heavily militarised exclave of Kaliningrad which is wedged between Nato members Poland and Lithuania

While Moscow has not acknowledged the project, construction activity in the Chernyakhovsk district strongly suggests the establishment of a Cold War-era style circular antenna array, modernised for today’s electronic warfare requirements.

What we know about this “spy base” at Nato’s doorstep

Investigators from the open-source research project Tochnyi, which monitors developments in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, have been studying the area for more than two years.

Their analysis indicates that a site in Kaliningrad began to take shape in March 2023 and has progressed steadily, with work continuing through mid-2025.

Located just south of an air base used by the Russian Navy’s Baltic Fleet, the installation sits about 60 miles from the Baltic Sea coast.

More from Explainers

Is Russia giving India more discount on oil after Trump tariffs? From India to Russia: The economic and military might of SCO nations

The satellite images reveal a pattern that closely resembles what specialists identify as a Circularly Disposed Antenna Array (CDAA). This type of system, widely used during the Cold War by both the Soviet Union and the United States, is designed for high-level communications intelligence.

Such complexes are capable of radio signal interception, direction finding, long-range communications with submarines, and tracking the movement of hostile forces.

By this month, the outlines of the installation were clear: a completed boundary wall surrounding the site, a checkpoint for access control, and a configuration of at least six concentric circles visible on the ground.

Editor’s Picks

1

Beyond the blocs: India’s strategic opportunity in a reinvigorated RIC 2

Brics rising: The unintended consequences of Trump’s tariff strategy

Soil displacement across evenly spaced intervals suggests possible excavation points for vertical antenna poles. “These look like excavation points that could host poles, which can be used to support antennas,” Tochnyi explained.

What makes the construction especially striking is its scale. Analysts estimate the array could stretch up to 1,600 metres across — placing it among the largest of its kind ever built.

According to Tochnyi, this would put the installation “well above the size range of known CDAAs.” For comparison, many Cold War-era CDAAs constructed in Europe or North America were significantly smaller.

The researchers point out that while it is not yet possible to confirm with absolute certainty that the structure is a CDAA, its geometry, scale, and location all strongly support that conclusion.

They noted multiple indicators: concentric excavation rings aligned with a central hub, radial trenches likely intended for underground signal cabling, and the establishment of a clear security perimeter.

What the Kaliningrad site could mean for Russia vs Nato

If operational, the Kaliningrad complex would vastly increase Russia’s electronic surveillance footprint across Nato’s eastern flank.

The location — less than 100 kilometres from both Poland and Lithuania — offers direct access to monitor activity inside alliance territory. The range of such an array would also enable coverage of communications in parts of Germany.

“From this site, Russia will be able to monitor tactical transmissions, radar networks, and even elements of civilian infrastructure across the alliance,” Tochnyi reported.

The site would give Moscow a powerful tool for intercepting sensitive Nato military communications. Analysts suggest it could capture battlefield-level transmissions, signals from radar systems, and logistical channels.

Also, beyond simply listening in, such a system could also facilitate electronic disruption. Defence experts warn that the ability to interfere with or jam Nato’s command, control, and communications networks could prove decisive in a confrontation.

Earlier studies by Polish researchers had already linked Kaliningrad to significant electronic interference. They traced disruptions in the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) across the Baltic Sea back to Russian antenna arrays along the coast.

These disturbances affected not only civilian aviation and shipping but also Nato’s military navigation. The suspected new CDAA would therefore enhance an already sophisticated electronic warfare environment.

Kaliningrad is not just another Russian region. As Moscow’s westernmost territory, it serves as a strategic outpost projecting power into the Baltic Sea. It already hosts a dense network of missile systems, radar stations, and hardened military infrastructure.

Nato observers have long considered it a forward-deployed fortress, capable of threatening sea lanes and air routes in Northern Europe.

“The placement of a CDAA-like structure in this region is strategically logical,” Tochnyi noted. “Such an installation would enable Russia to monitor Nato’s electronic communications across Eastern Europe and the Baltic region.”

The researchers also suggested the site could also communicate with Russian submarines in the Baltic Sea and even extend its reach into the North Atlantic, providing Moscow with enhanced situational awareness.

They concluded, “While still under construction, this new installation in Kaliningrad is likely a core node in Russia’s strategic signals intelligence and communications architecture. It represents a bridge between Cold War technology and modern military doctrine, one that values deniability, surveillance and information dominance.”

Among Russia’s few major bases abroad is Kaliningrad, long suspected of hosting a nuclear storage site as well.

Its militarisation has steadily expanded since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent confrontation with the West.

Why this matters now

The timing of revelations about Kaliningrad coincides with significant diplomatic manoeuvring between Washington and Moscow. On August 15, US President Donald Trump hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska.

It was Putin’s first visit to the United States in a decade.

The two leaders spoke behind closed doors for more than two hours but announced no concrete agreement afterwards. “We haven’t quite got there, but we’ve got some headway,” Trump said in a joint appearance. “There’s no deal until there’s a deal.”

US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff disclosed that Putin had expressed openness to a security guarantee for Ukraine modelled on Nato’s Article 5 — an arrangement under which an attack on one member is considered an attack on all.

Witkoff described this as “the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that.”

However, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov downplayed the possibility of any immediate breakthrough. He told NBC’s Meet the Press, “Putin is ready to meet with Zelenskyy when the agenda is ready for a summit, and this agenda is not ready at all.”

Lavrov added that when Trump raised the issue in Washington, it was evident that “there are several principles which Washington believes must be accepted, including no Nato membership, including the discussion of territorial issues, and Zelenskyy said no to everything.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, for his part, accused Russia of obstruction. He said Moscow was “doing everything they can to prevent the meeting from taking place.”

The Kaliningrad installation, if confirmed as a SIGINT base, is emblematic of the difficulty in de-escalating tensions between Russia and Nato-backed Ukraine.

With inputs from agencies