Oppenheimer, the epic new movie directed by Christopher Nolan, takes audiences into the mind and moral decisions of J Robert Oppenheimer, leader of the team of brilliant scientists in Los Alamos, New Mexico, who built the world’s first atomic bomb. It’s not a documentary, but it gets the big historical moments and subjects right. The issues that Nolan depicts are not relics of a distant past. The new world that Oppenheimer helped to create, and the nuclear nightmare he feared, still exists today. Russian president Vladimir Putin is
threatening to use nuclear weapons in his war in Ukraine. Iran is doing everything it can to
develop nuclear weapons. China is
expanding its nuclear arsenal. Hostile governments like China are
stealing US defence technologies, including from Los Alamos.
**Also Read: Oppenheimer: The outrage over Bhagavad Gita in sex scene and ‘I am death’ quote** Charges that Oppenheimer was a Soviet spy and a security risk – a major focus of the movie – have been disproved. In December 2022, the Biden administration posthumously voided the US Atomic Energy Commission’s 1954 decision to revoke Oppenheimer’s security clearance, calling that process
biased and unfair. Declassified records reveal that Soviet spying on the US atomic bomb effort advanced Moscow’s bomb program, but Oppenheimer was no spy. Oppenheimer’s perspective Oppenheimer joined the
Manhattan Project, a nationwide effort to build an atomic bomb before the Nazis developed one, in 1942. The scientists he led at the Los Alamos site were probably the most talented group of minds ever assembled in a single laboratory, including
12 eventual Nobel laureates. Also read: Who was Oppenheimer? What was his link to Hinduism? In 1954, at the height of the McCarthy era, Oppenheimer was accused of being a Communist and even a Soviet spy. What’s the truth? We know that in the 1930s, and until 1943, Oppenheimer was a Communist sympathiser. His
brother Frank and
his girlfriend Jean Tatlock belonged to the Communist Party of the United States, and Oppenheimer’s
wife Katherine was a former member. [caption id=“attachment_12913282” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] Oppenheimer was a Communist sympathiser until 1943. AP[/caption] For Oppy, as his students called him, Marxism was intellectually interesting, but it was also practical. Oppenheimer saw communism as the best defence against the rise of fascism in Europe, which, being of
Jewish heritage, was personal for him. By 1943, however, Oppenheimer’s support for Communist Party causes shifted – evidently, as he
realised the enormity of his mission to produce an atomic bomb. That year, Oppenheimer helped US Army security officers
identify scientists he believed were communists. Russian overtures Oppenehimer was a top target for Soviet intelligence, which assigned him the code names CHESTER and CHEMIST. He was also being cultivated by Soviet intelligence officers. But being targeted and cultivated for recruitment is not the same as being a recruited spy. As the movie shows, in 1943, Oppenheimer’s academic colleague at the University of California, Berkeley, Haakon Chevalier, told Oppenheimer that a British scientist working in San Francisco could relay information to the Soviets. Oppenheimer
rejected the approach, but for reasons that remain unclear, he did not inform authorities for several months.
**Also Read: Oppenheimer: Why the father of atomic bomb was offered Indian citizenship by Nehru?** Over the ensuing years, Oppenheimer provided at least three versions of the story, sometimes involving his brother Frank. It seems likely that Robert was trying to protect his brother from Army security. Archives made available after the Soviet Union’s collapse now establish beyond doubt that Oppenheimer
was not a Soviet agent. In fact, Soviet intelligence reports about the Manhattan Project reveal that at key points, Stalin’s spy chiefs were frustrated that their operatives had not recruited Oppenheimer. But the Russians did penetrate the Manhattan Project – the greatest security breach in US history. All the Kremlin’s men Multiple scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project provided critical information about US atomic bomb research to the Soviet Union. Oppenheimer focuses on
Klaus Fuchs, a brilliant theoretical physicist who fled from Nazi Germany to Britain and became a British naturalised subject. From the time he started to work on Britain’s wartime atom bomb project, Fuchs was in what he later described as “
continuous contact” with Soviet intelligence, providing theoretical calculations that were necessary to build the atom bomb. [caption id=“attachment_12913262” align=“alignnone” width=“640”]
Declassified records reveal that Soviet spying on the US atomic bomb effort advanced Moscow’s bomb program, but Oppenheimer was no spy. AP[/caption] General Leslie Groves, the military commander of the Manhattan Project, later
blamed the British for failing to identify Fuchs as a Soviet spy. That’s correct. But the declassified dossier on Fuchs from Britain’s security service, MI5, shows that at the time, the agency
did not have any positive, reliable evidence of Fuchs’s communism. MI5 knew that Fuchs was anti-Nazi, but not that he was pro-Soviet. As discussed in the book, Spies: The Epic Intelligence War Between East and West, other spies at Los Alamos included a prodigious scientist, Theodore “Ted” Hall (code name MLAD, or “Young”); Julius Rosenberg (code name ANTENNA, later LIBERAL); David Greenglass (BUMBLEBEE, CALIBER). Other Soviet spies, like the British scientist Alan Nunn May, worked in other parts of the Manhattan Project. These men had multiple motives for betraying US atomic secrets. They were communist true believers and thought atomic weapons were too powerful to be held by one country alone. Moreover, they had a (misguided) defence – that the Soviet Union was America’s wartime ally, so they were “only” delivering secrets to an allied government. But as Nolan correctly shows in the movie, when Chevalier approached Oppenheimer with the same argument, Oppenheimer retorted that
it was still treason.
**Also Read: Why Christopher Nolan's ‘Oppenheimer’ is 'the most important story of our time** Soviet espionage inside the Manhattan Project would change history. By the end of World War II, Stalin’s spies had delivered the secrets of the atomic bomb to the Kremlin. This accelerated Moscow’s bomb project. When the Soviets
detonated their first atomic weapon in August 1949, it was a replica of the weapon built at Los Alamos and dropped by the Americans on Nagasaki. Even now, nearly 80 years later, secrets about Soviet nuclear espionage are still emerging. One Soviet agent whose espionage has only recently been revealed is
George Koval (code name DEVAL), an American engineer who was drafted into the Manhattan Project, where he worked on polonium bomb “initiators” at a facility in Dayton, Ohio. After Koval died in 2006, at the age of 93, Russia’s ministry of defence disclosed that the initiator for the first Soviet atomic bomb was prepared to specifications provided by Koval. Putin posthumously honored Koval as a “Hero of Russia,”
offering a champagne toast in his honour. New targets If Nolan’s film inspires audiences to read the deeply researched
biography of Oppenheimer by Kai Bird and Martin Sherwin, which inspired Nolan to make this movie, or
other accounts of the Manhattan Project or the
Cold War, they will find that the underlying tissues of science and espionage remain alive. Today, the world stands at the edge of technological revolutions that will transform societies in the 21st Century, much as nuclear weapons did in the 20th Century: artificial intelligence, quantum computing and biological engineering. Watching Oppenheimer makes wonder whether hostile foreign governments may already have stolen keys to unlocking these new technologies, in the same way the Soviets did with the atom bomb.
This article is republished from
The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the
original article.
Archives made available after the Soviet Union’s collapse now establish beyond doubt that Oppenheimer was not a Soviet agent. In fact, intelligence reports about the Manhattan Project reveal that at key points, Stalin’s spy chiefs were frustrated that their operatives had not recruited him
Advertisement
End of Article