Was Hillary Clinton on tranquilisers during the 2016 campaign? What is the truth?

Recently declassified intelligence documents presented by US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard suggest that Russian operatives had access to sensitive health information about Hillary Clinton that included allegations of psychiatric instability and a daily regimen of heavy tranquilisers.

The documents, originally part of a 2020 House Intelligence Committee review into foreign interference during the 2016 campaign, were made public by Gabbard during a high-profile White House briefing on Wednesday.

What the declassified report claims about Clinton

According to the document released by Gabbard, Russia’s foreign intelligence services had obtained what was described as highly sensitive information from Democratic Party sources during the 2016 campaign.

Among the most startling revelations were that Clinton, then the Democratic presidential nominee, was allegedly consuming “heavy tranquilisers” daily and experiencing significant psychological challenges.

The report claims the Russian government was in possession of internal Democratic National Committee (DNC) communications that described Clinton’s behaviour in terms of “psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness.”

More from Explainers

Ex-US NSA John Bolton lambasts Tulsi Gabbard over ‘treasonous’ Obama report, calls it 'exaggerated' US, EU hypocrisy on India’s purchase of Russian oil comes to surface

🧵 New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President @realDonaldTrump's directive, I have declassified a @HouseIntel oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration… pic.twitter.com/0sS4Df8yoI

— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 23, 2025

In addition to these claims, the report also pointed to Clinton suffering from a range of chronic physical health conditions at the time. These included Type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

The documents assert that Democratic leadership and then US President Barack Obama were privately disturbed by Clinton’s deteriorating condition.

The text of the report notes, “As of September 2016, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service had Democratic National Committee (DNC) information that President Obama and Party leaders found the state of Secretary Clinton’s health to be ‘extraordinarily alarming,’ and felt it could have ‘serious negative impact’ on her election prospects.”

It further alleges that “her health information was being kept in ‘strictest secrecy’ and even close advisors were not being fully informed.”

What Putin allegedly decided to do with the info

The declassified materials suggest that Russia deliberately chose not to release the compromising information about Clinton during the 2016 election.

According to the assessment, Russian President Vladimir Putin believed Clinton’s win was all but certain and opted to withhold the information until after the election in order to undermine her presumed presidency.

The document says, “Putin chose not to leak the most damaging and compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election; instead planning to release it after the election to weaken what Moscow viewed would be an inevitable Clinton presidency.”

These findings were originally compiled as part of a Republican-led investigation in September 2020.

The probe included interviews with more than 20 intelligence personnel and a review of background materials used in the 2017 Obama-commissioned intelligence assessment on Russia’s influence campaign.

The current declassification by Gabbard has reopened debate over whether key details were downplayed or mischaracterised in that 2017 report.

How Gabbard has been going after Obama & Clinton

Gabbard also used the briefing to level broader allegations against the Obama administration.

She asserted that then-US President Obama and top national security officials deliberately manipulated the 2017 intelligence community assessment to suggest that Russia favoured Donald Trump, while knowingly excluding or misrepresenting other intelligence findings.

“There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false,” Gabbard said.

“They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true; it wasn’t.”

She further accused former CIA Director John Brennan and others of basing key conclusions on unreliable intelligence.

“Then CIA Director (John) Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterised intelligence and relied on dubious, substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote, unquote ‘clear preference for Trump’,” she said.

The released document also includes a section referring to a “campaign email discussing a plan approved by Secretary Clinton to link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump in order to ‘distract the American public’ from the Clinton email server scandal,” according to Fox News, which first reported the content.

How Obama has responded

Obama issued a formal statement via his office, dismissing the entire affair as a manufactured political distraction aimed at deflecting attention from other matters, particularly renewed scrutiny around files related to the late Jeffrey Epstein.

“These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,” Obama’s office said in the statement.

“Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.”

The statement added that the core findings of Russian influence efforts were affirmed in a bipartisan 2020 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee led by then-chairman Marco Rubio.

Multiple critics have accused Gabbard and the Trump White House of conflating the terms “hacking” and “influence operations” to create an exaggerated sense of conspiracy, while simultaneously seeking to rehabilitate Trump’s image in the eyes of his base.

How Trump has reacted

Trump, long an outspoken critic of the Russia investigation and of Clinton herself, has embraced the newly publicised report.

He has repeatedly characterised past investigations into Russian meddling as a political “witch hunt” and has used the document to reassert his long-standing claims of innocence.

In a video posted to social media, Trump went so far as to depict Obama in a prison jumpsuit.

When asked at the White House briefing whether Trump believes Obama should be prosecuted, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replied, “The president believes that this matter needs to be thoroughly investigated, and anyone convicted of crimes should be held accountable in this country.”

She added, “As for what accountability looks like, it’s in the Department of Justice’s hands and we trust them to be successful.”

Notably, Trump himself was convicted last year on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records in connection to hush money payments made during the 2016 campaign.

However, he received an “unconditional discharge” from the presiding judge — meaning he remains a convicted felon but faced no penalties or prison time.

Some legal analysts have pointed out that any potential prosecution of Obama or former officials would face significant hurdles, including a five-year statute of limitations for federal conspiracy charges and a 2024 US Supreme Court ruling that grants former presidents broad immunity for official acts performed while in office.

With inputs from agencies