 "Can Trump really prosecute Obama over the 2016 Russia probe?")
Is there a possibility of legal action against former United States President Barack Obama and senior officials from his administration by President Donald Trump?
At the centre of this growing controversy is Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic representative who now leads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
Gabbard has made extraordinary allegations involving the 2016 US election, characterising the actions of Obama-era intelligence officials as part of a coordinated attempt to undermine the legitimacy of Trump’s first election win.
Gabbard’s statements have gained traction within pro-Trump circles and prompted direct endorsement from the president himself.
Gabbard accuses Obama of orchestrating a “years-long coup”
Gabbard has publicly accused Barack Obama and several of his top national security advisers of participating in what she described as a deliberate and illegal effort to discredit Trump after his electoral win in November 2016.
According to her, the effort relied on “manufactured intelligence” and misrepresented analysis, and was aimed at supporting the idea that Russian interference had handed Trump the presidency.
In Gabbard’s words: “The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.”
“No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again. The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it.”
She claimed that the Obama administration’s post-election assessment of Russian interference contradicted the intelligence community’s consensus in the months before the election, which had allegedly concluded that Russia was unlikely to interfere or influence the outcome.
Her office has made available a cache of documents including a partially redacted Obama-era intelligence assessment on cyber threats, and internal memos from senior officials such as then-DNI James Clapper.
Among those named by Gabbard were Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former US Secretary of State John Kerry, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Obama himself.
Gabbard’s team also published commentary alongside these documents, alleging that leaks following a December 9, 2016, meeting of Obama’s senior national security team were part of a broader disinformation campaign.
The material refers to a memo titled The Russia Hoax, which claimed: “Deep State officials in the IC [intelligence community] begin leaking blatantly false intelligence to the Washington Post … claiming that Russia used ‘cyber means’ to influence ‘the outcome of the election.’”
“Later that evening, another leak to the Washington Post falsely alleges that the CIA ‘concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened’ in the election to help President Trump.”
The same document states that on January 6, 2017, the Obama administration publicly released a declassified intelligence assessment that referenced “further information” suggesting Russian President Vladimir Putin directed efforts to aid Trump’s campaign.
According to Gabbard, the additional information cited in the assessment turned out to include the Steele dossier, a compilation of unverified claims, some of which were later discredited.
How Trump responded
Trump has not only endorsed Gabbard’s accusations but has taken visible steps to promote the message.
Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump praised a Fox News appearance by Harrison Fields, a Special Assistant in his administration, stating: “Great job by young and talented Harrison Fields on Fox News. The Panel was fantastic on prosecuting Obama and the ‘thugs’ who have just been unequivocally exposed on highest level Election Fraud.”
“Congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard. Keep it coming!!!”
In a separate post on X, Gabbard wrote: “For months preceding the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community shared a consensus view: Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack US elections. But weeks after President Trump’s historic 2016 victory defeating Hillary Clinton, everything changed.”
🧵 Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the… pic.twitter.com/UQKKZ5c4Op
— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 18, 2025
Trump also posted a 45-second AI-generated video depicting Obama being arrested in the Oval Office. The video, which originally circulated on TikTok, was uploaded without commentary to Trump’s Truth Social account.
It began with real footage of Obama stating, “especially the President is above the law,” followed by various prominent Democrats, including Joe Biden, repeating the phrase “no one is above the law.”
Donald J. Trump Truth Social 07.20.25 06:47 PM EST pic.twitter.com/Xf5LYzkZiI
— Fan Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) July 20, 2025
The scene then shifts to a fabricated depiction of Trump and Obama in the White House, where FBI agents enter and arrest Obama, who later appears in a jail cell wearing an orange jumpsuit.
The soundtrack: “YMCA” by the Village People, a staple at Trump rallies.
Where the facts stand
Despite the volume of material released by Gabbard and the forcefulness of her claims, multiple previous investigations — both bipartisan and nonpartisan — have offered a more nuanced interpretation of Russia’s actions in 2016 and the Obama administration’s response.
Democratic lawmakers have called Gabbard’s report inaccurate and misleading. Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, labelled the allegations “baseless.”
Several reviews, including those by the US intelligence community and the Senate Intelligence Committee, have concluded that while Russian actors attempted to access voter registration data in states like Illinois and Arizona, there was no evidence that vote tallies were altered.
Intelligence reports also consistently stated that Russia’s primary effort was focused on influence operations — shaping American public opinion through disinformation, fake social media accounts, and leaked Democratic emails, rather than changing the actual results.
A Republican-led Senate report also endorsed the assessment that Moscow’s efforts were aimed at damaging Hillary Clinton and benefiting Donald Trump.
Among the Republicans on that committee was Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who now serves as US Secretary of State in the Trump administration.
A recent CIA review acknowledged concerns about how quickly the Obama-era assessment had been compiled, reported The New York Times.
In its wake, the agency referred John Brennan to the FBI for investigation regarding how he managed the preparation of the intelligence conclusions. However, no charges have been brought.
One email cited in Gabbard’s documentation indicated that Obama requested a comprehensive assessment of Russian interference methods before leaving office, fearing that an incoming Trump administration might suppress or ignore the intelligence findings.
US Senator Mark Warner of Virginia responded to the Gabbard report by stating: “This is one more example of the director of national intelligence trying to cook the books. We’re talking about apples and oranges. The Russians were not successful at manipulating our election infrastructure, nor did we say they were.”
Warner also pointed out that recent intelligence assessments under Gabbard’s leadership still acknowledge that Russia continues to engage in influence operations targeting the United States.
A March intelligence report concluded that: “Moscow probably believes information operations efforts to influence U.S. elections are advantageous,” and that these activities are part of a long-term strategy to undermine confidence in American democracy.
The big question: Can Trump legally prosecute Obama?
The question of whether Trump can direct federal prosecutors to pursue criminal cases against Obama or his former officials rests not on legal prohibition, but on political precedent.
Since US President Richard Nixon resigned amid the Watergate scandal in 1974, successive administrations have generally refrained from overtly influencing prosecutorial decisions at the Department of Justice (DOJ).
However, these boundaries are guided more by custom than law.
Within the US system, both the Attorney General and FBI Director are appointed by the President and serve within the executive branch.
Trump, in his first term, dismissed FBI Director James Comey in 2017 and again replaced Christopher Wray in his second term, putting Kash Patel at the head of the FBI.
Legal experts note that if Trump installs loyalists in key roles — including US attorneys and assistant attorneys general — he could wield substantial influence over federal investigations and prosecutions.
Critics warn that this may enable Trump to direct legal action against political rivals, including by reopening unsubstantiated allegations or launching new inquiries into figures like Obama, Biden, or former officials involved in the Russia investigation.
While the law does not explicitly bar a sitting president from seeking investigations into a predecessor, doing so would test long-standing institutional norms designed to keep politics separate from law enforcement.
Also Watch:
With inputs from agencies
 "After meeting with European leaders, Trump warns Russia of 'severe consequences' if it resists peace deal")
 "'Not a single policymaking person who knows Russia,Ukraine' as Trump heads for talks with Putin")
 "Air Canada to shut all flights, lock out its flight attendants weekend onwards: Here's why")
 "PSG stage a stunning comeback victory over Tottenham to secure the Super Cup title")
 "After meeting with European leaders, Trump warns Russia of 'severe consequences' if it resists peace deal")
 "'Not a single policymaking person who knows Russia,Ukraine' as Trump heads for talks with Putin")
 "Air Canada to shut all flights, lock out its flight attendants weekend onwards: Here's why")
 "PSG stage a stunning comeback victory over Tottenham to secure the Super Cup title")
