Explained: Why Punjab’s decision to revert to Old Pension Scheme could be disastrous

Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann made a big announcement on Monday — his government is looking into the possibility of reverting to the old pension scheme (OPS). On Monday, the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP) Mann said on Twitter, “My government is considering reverting to the old pension system (OPS). I have asked my chief secretary to study the feasibility and modalities of its implementation. We stand committed to the welfare of our employees.”

My government is considering reverting to the Old Pension System (OPS). I have asked my Chief Secretary to study the feasibility and modalities of it’s implementation. We stand committed to the welfare of our employees.

— Bhagwant Mann (@BhagwantMann) September 19, 2022

What is the OPS? How is it different from the New Pension Scheme? What are the politics behind reverting to OPS and what does it mean for the pensioners? Here’s a one-stop guide to knowing everything about the scheme and the pros and cons of each of them. What is OPS and NPS? On 1 April 2004, the central government, under Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, discontinued the Old Pension Scheme and introduced the New Pension Scheme. In the old regime, pension was 50 per cent of the last drawn salary of the employee and the entire amount was paid by the government. The New Pension Scheme (NPS), launched as a way to reduce pension liabilities, allows subscribers (government employees) to decide where they want to invest their money by contributing regularly in a pension account throughout their career. At the age of retirement (60 years), you can withdraw 60 per cent of the proceeds as lump sum. This sum was taxable earlier but is now tax-free. Pensioners can use the rest to buy an annuity for a regular income. [caption id=“attachment_11293711” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] Graphic: Pranay Bhardwaj[/caption] Under the NPS, effective for employees who joined on or after 1 April 2004, the employees contribute 10 per cent of their salary towards pension and the state government contributes 14 per cent. The amount is then deposited with Pension Fund Regulatory & Development Authority (PFRDA) where it is invested. The key differences between OPS and NPS are that NPS invests employees’ contributions over the length of their careers in market securities such as equities. “Thus, the NPS generates market-linked returns without any assurance of returns, which the OPS provides by basing the monthly pension on the last salary drawn by the employee. NPS provides a pension fund on retirement which is 60 per cent tax-free on redemption while the rest needs to be invested in annuity which is fully taxable. Income from OPS is not taxed. Lastly, OPS may require governments to revisit their fiscal priorities while NPS was meant to ease that very requirement,” Adhil Shetty, CEO, Bankbazaar.com, explained to The Outlook. Punjab’s demand for OPS Mann’s announcement of his government looking at reverting to the OPS is in response to the state government employees’ long-standing demand for the same. In fact, the AAP had first promised to do away with the New Pension Scheme (NPS), and reintroduce the old pension scheme during the 2017 Assembly elections. The issue was raised again last year in August by party leader Harpal Singh Cheema, who is currently the finance minister. If implemented, the move is likely to benefit around 1,60,000 Punjab staffers who joined service after 2004, according to state employee unions leaders. Arvind Kejriwal, the national president of the AAP, also hailed Mann, saying it was a “great decision”.

Wow! A great decision. All govt employees across India want Old pension scheme to be restored. https://t.co/rOll0SY5CU

— Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) September 19, 2022

More from India

India to host fifth Coast Guard Global Summit in Chennai in 2027 'New dawn': PM Modi meets Manipur violence victims in first visit since 2023 unrest

Punjab Civil Secretariat Staff Association chairman Sukhchain Singh Khaira also welcomed the chief minister’s announcement and said the state government employees have been struggling to get the old pension system restored. Which states have reverted to OPS? Chhattisgarh was the first state to announce that it was reverting to the old regime. In February, Rajasthan’s Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot too announced the restoration of OPS for employees appointed on or after 1 January 2004.

Jharkhand, led by Chief Minister Hemant Soren, also implemented the old regime earlier this month.

एक और वादा हुआ पूरा।

झारखण्ड राज्य में सरकारी कर्मचारियों के लिए पुरानी पेंशन हुई लागू।

जोहार। pic.twitter.com/Dob85op0lR

— Hemant Soren (@HemantSorenJMM) September 1, 2022

Pension politics The switch to the old pension scheme has in recent times become a hot political topic. On 19 September, the Congress vowed to implement the old regime for state employees if it was voted into power in the state of Gujarat. Senior Gujarat Congress leader Arjun Modhwadia said Mann was considering reverting to the OPS, whereas the governments in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh have already implemented it. “The Congress will do the same when voted to power in Gujarat. I have seen his (Mann’s) tweet. He has only said he will consider it. He has not made any announcement or issued a government resolution for the same, nor taken any decision. On the other hand, Congress governments in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh have implemented it,” Modhwadia told reporters as per PTI. “It is our promise to all the employees in Gujarat who joined on or after 2004 that we will do the same here when voted to power,” reiterated Gujarat Congress state in-charge Raghu Sharma.

પેન્શન એ સરકારી કર્મચારીઓનો અધિકાર છે.

છત્તીસગઢ અને રાજસ્થાન ની કોંગ્રેસ સરકારે
જૂની પેન્શન યોજના લાગુ કરીને સરકારી કર્મચારીઓના અધિકારો પરત કર્યા છે.

ગુજરાતમાં કોંગ્રેસની સરકાર બનતા જ
જૂની પેન્શન યોજના લાગુ કરવામાં આવશે.

કોંગ્રેસ આવશે ખુશહાલી લાવશે.#CongressDegiOldPension pic.twitter.com/dnPFDnX0T2

— Jagdish Thakor (@jagdishthakormp) September 20, 2022

Impact Shorts

More Shorts

'New dawn': PM Modi meets Manipur violence victims in first visit since 2023 unrest

CP Radhakrishnan takes oath as Vice President of India

In fact, the National Movement for Old Pension Scheme — a nationwide organisation set up seven years ago demanding the scrapping of the NPS — has said that it would support any political party in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh elections which promises OPS. On Tuesday, Arvind Kejriwal also vowed that if the AAP came to power in Gujarat, it would implement OPS.

गुजरात के सभी सरकारी कर्मचारियों को मैं गारंटी देता हूँ कि हमारी सरकार old pension scheme लागू करेगी। https://t.co/TNohcQVbXu

— Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) September 20, 2022

[caption id=“attachment_11293841” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] State government employees have long been demanding for the switch to the Old Pension Scheme. PTI[/caption] Financial implications of OPS Vijay Kumar Bandhu, who is president of the National Movement for Old Pension Scheme, has hailed the old regime, arguing that under the NPS the pension does not increase with subsequent pay commissions; there are few benefits in case of death while in service; and employees have to deal with private insurance companies, and not the government, in case of a dispute. However, financial experts state that under the OPS, the burden on state finances would only rise. [caption id=“attachment_11293851” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] Graphic: Pranay Bhardwaj[/caption] Former Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, speaking to The Week, said, “OPS will, over time, make government finances unsustainable. State government finances are not always in the pink. They depend largely on central funds. Therefore, if there is any extra burden, their financial situation would become unsustainable. It is long-term economic reforms versus populism.” **Also read: Tamil Nadu's economy is in a mess, Mr Thiaga Rajan: Here’s the hard truth about state’s spiralling debt** Renuka Sane, associate professor at National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, Delhi, echoed similar sentiments, saying, “OPS is fiscally unsustainable because of demographic transition. There are more old people now. You are paying through the tax revenue system, as there is no contribution. Earlier, people would live five to 10 years post retirement. Now, people live 25 years post retirement. Then their family or spouse will live another five years. So the obligation on the government becomes huge.” In March, SBI research said that the old scheme is not sustainable for state’s finances even though it is always an attractive option for political parties as current aged people can benefit from the old scheme even though they may not have contributed to the pension kitty. “We should not commit fiscal hara-kiri in the quest for populism. Otherwise it will be disastrous for the country’s growth potential and at the same time place a higher burden on our younger generation,” the report, which was authored by SBI Group Chief Economic Adviser Soumya Kanti Ghosh, read. With inputs from agencies Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.