Prosecutor tells jury ‘it’s time’ to convict Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs as sex trafficking trial near end

Sean “Diddy” Combs “committed crime after crime” for two decades but thought his “fame, wealth and power” put him above the law, a prosecutor told jurors Thursday as the hip-hop mogul’s sex trafficking trial shifted to closing arguments.

“That stops now,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik said. “It’s time to hold him accountable. It’s time for justice. It’s time to find the defendant guilty.”

Combs, 55, sat with his head down as Slavik highlighted testimony and evidence from the seven-week trial that she said proved sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and other charges. Wearing a sweater and khakis, he sometimes scribbled notes to his lawyers and shook his head as Slavik played one of his audio messages for the jury.

“Over the last several weeks, you’ve learned a lot about Sean Combs,” Slavik said, launching into a nearly five-hour presentation. “He’s the leader of a criminal enterprise. He doesn’t take no for an answer. And now you know about many crimes he committed with members of his enterprise.”

More from Entertainment

'Jugnuma' Movie Review: Manoj Bajpayee-Deepak Dobriyal’s terrific performances stood out in this beautifully restrained way of storytelling 'Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale' Movie Review: The final goodbye of Julian Fellowes’s beloved British soap

Among the proof, Slavik argued, was evidence that Combs kidnapped an employee, was involved in setting rapper Kid Cudi’s convertible ablaze, bribed a hotel guard and carried out “brutal crimes at the heart of this case — sex trafficking.”

Combs “again and again forced, threatened and manipulated” his ex-girlfriends Cassie and Jane into “having sex with escorts for his own entertainment,” Slavik said, her lectern directly in front of jurors.

The prosecutor said Combs forced or coerced Cassie, whose real name is Casandra Ventura, and Jane, who testified under a pseudonym, to engage in dayslong sex marathons known as “freak-offs” or “hotel nights” with drugs, violence, or by threatening financial harm or the release of video recordings of some of the hundreds of encounters.

“Up until today, the defendant was able to get away with these crimes,” Slavik said.

Combs used silence and shame, prosecutor says

Bookending the trial’s start, jurors again saw now-infamous security footage of Combs hitting, kicking and dragging Cassie at the Intercontinental Hotel in Los Angeles in 2016 after she tried to leave a freak-off with a male sex worker.

“He knew exactly what he was doing. That is sex trafficking,” Slavik told the jury, adding that Combs was “knowingly using force and coercion to get Cassie back to that room where the escort was waiting.”

Slavik said Combs “counted on silence and shame” to enable and prolong his abuse. He used a “small army” of employees, including personal assistants and bodyguards, to harm women and cover it up, she said.

“But over the course of this trial, his crimes have been exposed,” the prosecutor added.

The theory of racketeering law is that when someone commits a crime as part of a group “they’re more powerful and dangerous,” Slavik said. “The defendant was a very powerful man, but he became more powerful and dangerous because of the support of his inner circle and his businesses — the enterprise.”

Combs and his inner circle “committed hundreds of racketeering acts,” she said.

Combs’ family in court with defense’s argument up next

Members of Combs’ family, including several of his children, watched from wooden benches in the packed courtroom. During a break, he turned and gave them a thumbs-up.

Since his arrest at a Manhattan hotel last September, Combs and his lawyers have insisted he is innocent, though they conceded at trial that domestic violence occurred.

Combs “was abusive — physical, emotional, psychological, sexual abuse,” Slavik said. “The defendant doesn’t deny the abuse. They just want you to call it ‘domestic violence’ and to believe that it has nothing to do with the crimes charged here.”

The defense will give its closing argument on Friday, followed by a prosecution rebuttal argument. Then, Judge Arun Subramanian will instruct jurors on the law before deliberations begin.

Combs’ lawyers built their case for acquittal through lengthy cross-examinations of government witnesses. Some testified only in response to subpoenas and insisted they didn’t want to be there.

Combs’ ‘foot soldiers’ agreed to commit crimes, Slavik says

Combs’ lawyers contend there was no racketeering conspiracy because no employees agreed to join any conspiracy.

Slavik said that’s wrong, and that Combs’ employees repeatedly agreed to commit crimes for him, including delivering him drugs; accompanying him to kidnap his personal assistant; and locking Cassie in a hotel room after he stomped on her face.

The charge falls under RICO — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act — which is best known for being used in organized crime and drug cartel cases.

At one point, Slavik referred to Combs’ employees as his “foot soldiers.”

As Slavik returned repeatedly to the topic of Combs’ sex marathons, jurors saw a slide that said “The Freak Offs” next to a photo of him laying on a bed bathed in red light.

Slavik reminded jurors of text messages and testimony that showed that the women didn’t want to participate, including one in which Jane told Combs that she felt he gave her no choice.

“It’s dark, sleazy and makes me feel disgusted with myself. I feel it’s the only reason you have me around and why you pay for the house,” Jane wrote. “I don’t want to feel obligated to perform these nights with you in fear of losing the roof over my head.”