 "When can Trump win Nobel Peace Prize? Experts say ‘maybe next year’; but who will get it this year?")
When it comes to this year’s Nobel Peace Prize, one thing is almost certain: US President Donald Trump will not win, no matter how much he wants it. But who will?
The Norwegian Nobel Committee in Oslo will bring the suspense to an end when it announces the winner Friday at 11:00 am.
The backdrop is bleak: the number of armed conflicts worldwide involving at least one state has never been as high as in 2024, since Sweden’s Uppsala University started its global conflict database in 1946.
Trump has repeatedly said he deserves the prestigious prize for resolving “eight conflicts”, but experts predict he will not be the committee’s choice – at least not this year.
“No, it will not be Trump this year,” Swedish professor Peter Wallensteen, an expert on international affairs, told AFP.
“But perhaps next year? By then the dust will have settled around his various initiatives, including the Gaza crisis,” he added.
Numerous experts consider Trump’s “peacemaker” claims to be exaggerated and express concerns over the consequences of his “America First” policies.
“Beyond trying to broker peace for Gaza, we have seen policies that actually go against the intentions and what’s written in the will of (Alfred) Nobel, notably to promote international cooperation, the fraternity of nations and disarmament,” said Nina Graeger, who heads the Peace Research Institute of Oslo.
Impact Shorts
More ShortsFor Graeger, the list of Trump’s actions not aligned with the ideals of the Nobel Peace Prize is long.
Trump has withdrawn the US from international organisations and multilateral treaties, launched trade wars against allies and enemies alike, threatened to take Greenland from Denmark by force, ordered the National Guard into US cities and attacked universities’ academic freedoms as well as freedom of expression.
“We take the complete picture into account,” explained Jorgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the five-member committee awarding the peace prize.
“The whole organisation or the complete personality of that person matters, but what we first and foremost look at is what they have been actually achieving for the sake of peace,” he said.
Uncontroversial pick?
This year, 338 individuals and organisations have been nominated for the peace prize, with the list kept secret for 50 years.
Tens of thousands of people are eligible to propose candidates, including lawmakers and cabinet members of all countries, former laureates, certain university professors and Nobel committee members.
In 2024, the award went to Japan’s atomic bomb survivors’ group Nihon Hidankyo for its efforts to ban nuclear weapons.
With no clear favourite this year, several names have been doing the rounds in Oslo ahead of Friday’s announcement.
Sudan’s Emergency Response Rooms – a network of volunteers risking their lives to feed and help people enduring war and famine – have been mentioned, as has Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny, and the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights election watchdog.
The Nobel committee’s choices in recent years have demonstrated “a return to more micro things, somewhat closer to classical ideas of peace”, with a focus on “human rights, democracy, freedom of the press and women”, said Halvard Leira, the director of the Norwegian Institute for International Affairs.
“My hunch would probably just perhaps be for a not that controversial candidate this year,” he said.
The Nobel committee could also choose to reaffirm its commitment to a world order currently being challenged by Trump by giving the prize to United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres, or a UN body like its refugee agency UNHCR or Palestinian relief agency UNRWA.
It could also give the nod to international tribunals such as the International Court of Justice or the International Criminal Court, or champion press freedoms currently under attack by giving it to the Committee to Protect Journalists or Reporters Without Borders.
But the committee could also do as it has done many times before and pick a completely unexpected winner.
(Except the headline, this story has not been edited by Firstpost staff.)
 "Taliban, internet and Afghan women: A 48-hour blackout that silenced more than voices")
 "US approves sale of AMRAAM missiles to Pakistan: Should India be concerned?")
 "‘Foreign agents’: Why Russia has suddenly turned tables on pro-war bloggers")
 "Pakistan: 11 paramilitary troops killed in TTP ambush near Afghan border, says report")
 "Taliban, internet and Afghan women: A 48-hour blackout that silenced more than voices")
 "US approves sale of AMRAAM missiles to Pakistan: Should India be concerned?")
 "‘Foreign agents’: Why Russia has suddenly turned tables on pro-war bloggers")
 "Pakistan: 11 paramilitary troops killed in TTP ambush near Afghan border, says report")
