Uruguay bill proposing to allow dictatorship-era war criminals to serve sentences from home sparks debate

Uruguay’s Senate has passed a controversial bill allowing military officers, involved in human rights abuses during the country’s dictatorship (1973-1985), to serve sentences at home if they are over 65. The critiques, however, argue the law, dubbed a “humanitarian measure,” would benefit not just elderly convicts but also mothers and pregnant women in jail. However, critics, including victims’ organisations, condemn it as a “big step backward” and “morally unacceptable.” Patricia López, from the Association of Mothers and Relatives of Uruguayan Disappeared Persons, asserts the law hampers justice for dictatorship victims. Carmen Asiaín, a supporting senator, emphasizes adherence to international human rights conventions, stating that only those with poor physical or mental health affecting “human dignity” can qualify for house arrest. The proposed law excludes those guilty of crimes against humanity, but human rights activists argue it could apply to most convicted officers found guilty of lesser offenses. Uruguay’s military regime led to torture, disappearances, and extrajudicial killings, with thousands suffering under its 12-year rule. Observers fear the legislation might lead to the release of previously convicted officers, especially given the time elapsed since the dictatorship. An immunity law, in force until 2011, shielded armed forces members from accusations. Despite ongoing efforts, only 28 individuals have been convicted for dictatorship-era abuses. Pablo Chargoñia of Observatorio Luz Ibarburu warns the proposed law could send the few convicted officers home, while survivors like Sara Méndez, who endured kidnapping and torture, voice concerns. Sara, now reunited with her son after 25 years, fears the bill lacks differentiation between common crimes and state-committed atrocities. She stresses the victim’s opinion should be considered in modifying prison regimes for convicted officers. The proposed law has ignited a broader debate on justice, accountability, and distinguishing between crimes committed by the state and common offenses. As Uruguay grapples with its past, the proposed legislation’s potential impact on convicted officers and the quest for truth about disappeared individuals remains a contentious issue.