Trending:

In Graphics | How did red and blue become synonymous with Republicans and Democrats?

FP Explainers November 1, 2024, 16:56:58 IST

The colour association of red for Republicans and blue for Democrats became solidified during the highly polarised 2000 US presidential election. Although the choice wasn’t ideologically motivated, the consistent media usage created a lasting visual shorthand that uniquely shaped US political identity

Advertisement
A girls colours an electoral map of the United States in either red or blue ahead of the US general election in Raleigh, North Carolina, US. The 2024 US presidential election will take place on Tuesday, November 5. File Image/Reuters
A girls colours an electoral map of the United States in either red or blue ahead of the US general election in Raleigh, North Carolina, US. The 2024 US presidential election will take place on Tuesday, November 5. File Image/Reuters

The 2024 US presidential election is just days away. And the big question is whether numerous contested states will turn red or blue. But how did this practice of describing Republican states and the party’s supporters as red and Democrat states and its supporters as blue, start?

The colour association of red for Republicans and blue for Democrats became widely recognised in the 2000 US presidential election, but the tradition wasn’t always this way.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Originally, colours used in election maps varied widely, with no consistent scheme across networks. Sometimes blue represented the incumbent party, sometimes the challenging party, and it even switched between elections.

A supporter looks on as Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump speaks on stage during a rally at Madison Square Garden, in New York, US. File Image/Reuters

The 2000 election, however, was highly polarised and closely contested between George W Bush and Al Gore, which led media networks to develop colour-coded maps that were used in nearly continuous coverage.

Different networks chose different colour assignments, but many eventually gravitated towards red for Republican and blue for Democratic as the race dragged on due to the recount dispute in Florida. The prolonged media focus on a single set of colour associations cemented the scheme in the public’s mind.

The choice wasn’t based on historical or ideological reasons; it was more a product of convention and consistency. The association stuck, and the terms “red states” and “blue states” became part of the national lexicon to describe Republican-leaning and Democratic-leaning states.

Supporters listen as democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a campaign rally at the Wings Event Center in Kalamazoo, Michigan, US. File Image/AP

Eventually, red and blue colours became so culturally significant that they influenced merchandise, logos, and campaign materials, reinforcing the association.

Also Read: Why are US states divided into red, blue and purple?

Interestingly, this colour association is somewhat unique to the United States. In many other countries, red is often associated with left-wing or progressive parties, reflecting socialism or workers’ movements, while blue is more commonly linked with conservative factions.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

The US divergence in colour coding speaks more to the power of media influence than any historical alignment.

We delve deeper:

Also Read | From Abortion to Zelenskyy: The A to Z of the US presidential election campaign explained

With inputs from agencies

QUICK LINKS

Home Video Shorts Live TV