Democrats claim Pentagon boss Hegesth paused military aid to Ukraine by falsely citing weapon shortages

After US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth unilaterally halted agreed shipments of military aid to Ukraine, Democrats argue that the Pentagon boss cited baseless concerns that the American weapon stockpile was running low to announce such a measure. Before Hegseth’s proclamation, a batch of air defence missiles and other precision munitions were due to be sent to Ukraine to aid it in its ongoing war with Russia.

These aid pledges were made during former US President Joe Biden’s tenure. However, Hegseth went on to conduct a presser in which he announced the halting of shipments of weapons to Ukraine. According to a NBC News report, the Pentagon chief solely decided to halt sending aid even though experts noted the aid would not have jeopardised the US readiness.

As per the report, this is the third time Hegseth has halted US military supplies to Ukraine. When US President Donald Trump was asked about the pause on Thursday, he claimed that it was a necessary move because “Biden emptied our whole country, giving them weapons, and we have to make sure we have enough for ourselves”.

More from United States Of America

B-2 bomber to Ukraine policy reversal: 5 indications that Trump’s defence policy is in chaos Trump says he is 'disappointed' in Russia, hints at making 'big statement' on Monday

What is the Trump administration’s argument?

Last week, A White House spokesperson said that the move “was made to put America’s interests first following a [defence department] review of our nation’s military support and assistance to other countries across the globe. The strength of the United States armed forces remains unquestioned – just ask Iran.”

Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told reporters on Wednesday that “the capability review is being conducted to ensure US military aid aligns with our defence priorities.”

“We see this as a commonsense, pragmatic step towards having a framework to evaluate what munitions are sent and where,” Parnell added. He also seemed to confirm that there is no current shortage of arms for US forces. “Let it be known that our military has everything that it needs to conduct any mission, anywhere, anytime, all around the world,” he said.

Quick Reads

View All

US changing its nuclear playbook? States offered deals to host radioactive waste: Report

‘America will not become a nation of renters’: Trump blames Biden for soaring housing prices in US

What is Congress thinking?

The move surprised several members of Congress as well as Ukraine's European allies. Democrats argued that there is no evidence that American weapon stocks are in decline. “We are not at any lower point, stockpile-wise, than we’ve been in the three-and-a-half years of the Ukraine conflict,” Adam Smith, a Democrat and ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, told NBC News. Smith said that his staff had “seen the numbers” on weapon supplies and that there is no justification to suspend aid to Ukraine.

The weapons that are being delayed by the pause include dozens of Patriot interceptor missiles that can defend against Russian missile attacks, as well as howitzers and other missile systems.

Amid the pause, Russia has recently ramped up its bombardment of Ukrainian cities, using missiles, wreaking havoc among civilians in the war-torn country. “This decision is certainly very unpleasant for us,” said Fedir Venislavskyi, a member of the Ukrainian parliament’s defence committee, according to Reuters. “It’s painful, and against the background of the terrorist attacks which Russia commits against Ukraine.” The Department of Defence is yet to respond to the charges.