Supreme Court rejects Musharraf review petition on 2007 emergency

In a setback to Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan’s Supreme Court dismissed his petition seeking a review of its verdict that declared the 2007 emergency imposed by the embattled former dictator unconstitutional. A 14-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, said the time period for filing an appeal has lapsed. It further said the review petition was not maintainable as it did not fulfill the criteria of merit. The bench said arguments presented by the 70-year-old Musharraf were irrelevant to the case. [caption id=“attachment_1366769” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]  Musharraf at an earlier court appearance[/caption] In an order issued in July 2009, the apex court had declared the emergency proclaimed by Musharraf in November 2007 as unconstitutional. On December 23 last year, Musharraf filed a petition after a delay of over four years seeking a review of the apex court’s verdict. The petition stated Musharraf was facing trial in a special court on charges of high treason on the basis of the apex court’s July 2009 order. The petition argued that former Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz had recommended taking extra-constitutional measures to proclaim an emergency in 2007. Musharraf’s lawyers had repeatedly sought time from the special court trying him for treason on the ground that the apex court was yet to decide his review petition. The former army chief was admitted to a hospital in Rawalpindi on 2 January after he developed heart problems while being driven to the special court. During today’s hearing in the Supreme Court, Musharraf’s counsel Sharifuddin Pirzada said unconstitutional steps had been taken several times in Pakistan’s past and the judiciary had endorsed these steps on important issues. To substantiate his claims, Pirzada also gave the example of emergency being imposed in Canada and India. On hearing this, Justice Jawad Khawaja asked if constitutional provisions on treason were applicable in Canada, and Pirzada replied they were applicable in Canada and a few other countries. Musharraf is the first military ruler to be put on trial for treason in Pakistan’s history. If convicted, he could face life imprisonment or the death penalty. Meanwhile, the prosecutor in the treason case, Akram Sheikh, said Musharraf’s medical report was “unprofessional” and it did not include relevant test records. Sheikh argued that an ECG and angiography is conducted within 48 to 72 hours if a patient is critical. But in Musharraf’s case, no ECG has been done even after his admission to the Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology 28 days ago. He described Musharraf’s medical report as “unprofessional” and said the doctors’ advice carries no importance as relevant test records were not submitted with the report. PTI