Washington: Many animals at the brink of extinction may disappear during the ongoing sixth mass-extinction event without leaving behind any permanent fossil record, according to a new study.
"Comparing the current biodiversity crisis, often called the 'sixth extinction,' with those of the geological past
requires equivalent data," said Roy Plotnick, professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Researchers compared the "Red List" of endangered species with several ecological databases of living species and three paleontological databases of catalogued fossils.
They ran a statistical analysis to indicate which threatened species were most likely to disappear with no mark of their existence.
More than 85 per cent of the mammal species at high risk of extinction lack a fossil record, researchers found.
Those at highest risk have about half the probability of being incorporated into the fossil record compared to those at lower risk.
Animals least likely to be found as fossils are "the small, cute and fuzzy ones, like rodents and bats," Plotnick said.
"Body size is an obvious factor - bigger things tend to leave a fossil record, as do things with larger geographical ranges," he said.
Viewed from the perspective of the fossil record alone, the magnitude of the current mammal die-off thus appears markedly reduced.
The picture may be even more distorted for other land-dwelling vertebrates - only 3 per cent of today's threatened bird species and 1.6 per cent of threatened reptile species have a known fossil record.
Comparing the scale of the current extinction episode to earlier extinctions that are mostly calculated from the fossil record of hard-shelled marine invertebrates, is particularly problematic, although ancient extinctions may also be underestimated by contemporary paleontologists, Plotnick said.
Nevertheless, fossils will provide the only reliable record of life on Earth for posterity, he said.
"There are species going extinct today that have never been described. Others are going extinct that are known only because someone wrote it down," Plotnick said.
All such species would thus be unknown in the far future, he said, if the written historical record is lost - as it
might well be.
The fossil record is much more durable than any human record, Plotnick said.
"Clay tablets last longer than books. And who today can read an 8-inch floppy?" he asked.
"If we put everything on electronic media, will those records exist in a million years? The fossils will," he said.
Firstpost is now on WhatsApp. For the latest analysis, commentary and news updates, sign up for our WhatsApp services. Just go to Firstpost.com/Whatsapp and hit the Subscribe button.
Updated Date: Mar 22, 2016 14:08:50 IST