Science panel recommends exploring air cooling tech as climate emergency tool

The report doesn’t recommend carrying out solar geoengineering to bounce heat back to space. At least not yet.

The Associated Press March 26, 2021 10:13:46 IST
Science panel recommends exploring air cooling tech as climate emergency tool

A world without cars, planes, ships and factories powered by fossil fuels will need to be a reality in 40 years to have a realistic hope of keeping global warming below safe levels, scientists claim. Image: Stock photo

The US must seriously consider the idea of tinkering with the atmosphere to cool a warming Earth and accelerate research into how and whether humanity should hack the planet, the National Academy of Sciences said Thursday. The report by the academy, set up by Abraham Lincoln to provide the government with expert advice, doesn’t recommend carrying out solar geoengineering to bounce heat back to space. At least not yet. But an emergency plan needs to be explored, the report says, because climate change-driven extreme weather has worsened since the last time the academy looked at the highly-charged issue in 2015. That requires coordinated research into whether air-tinkering technology would work, its potentially dangerous side effects, its ethics and the potential for political fall-out.

The report looks at three possible ways to cool the air: Putting heat-reflecting particles in the stratosphere, changing the brightness of ocean clouds and thinning high clouds.

“Climate engineering is a really dumb idea, but it might not be as dumb as doing nothing at this point or continuing to do what we’ve been doing,” Scripps Institution of Oceanography atmospheric chemist Lynn Russell, a report co-author, told The Associated Press. “It has a lot of risks and those are important to learn as much as we can about.”

Science panel recommends exploring air cooling tech as climate emergency tool

Earth’s atmosphere 2.7 billion years ago was less than half as thick as it is today. Image: NASA

The panel recommended ramping up research spending by several fold to US $40 million a year, along with “exit ramps” to end study if an unacceptable risk is found.

“I honestly don’t know whether or not it’s going to make sense,” said committee chairman Chris Field of Stanford University.

Critics, such as Oxford University’s Raymond Pierrehumbert, worry that there’s a “moral hazard” providing a tempting option to use questionable technology instead of the necessary cutting back on carbon pollution. He said the term geoengineering wrongly makes it sound like humans have control over heat like a thermostat.

Texas A&M University’s Andrew Dessler sees geoengineering as a safety feature for the planet, like car airbags you hope to never need.

A Harvard team is working on a small-scale experiment where eventually a balloon would put a few pounds of aerosols 12 miles (20 kilometers) into the air to reflect the sun. That group hopes to run a system test, with no chemical injection, later this year over Sweden.

This report is more forceful than the 2015 version, detailing government oversight and how research should be done, said academy president Marcia McNutt, who chaired the earlier study.

Is geoengineering too risky to even consider?

“It is not so much playing with fire as it is researching fire, so that we understand it well enough to deploy, if necessary,″ said Waleed Abdalati, a former NASA chief scientist who was on the 2015 panel. “Sometimes you have to examine very risky options when the stakes are as high as they are with climate change.”

Updated Date:

also read

South China floods force tens of thousands to evacuate
Photos

South China floods force tens of thousands to evacuate

In Jiangxi, almost 500,000 people have seen damages to their homes and their lives uprooted

Explained: How a team of Japanese scientists invented “human living skin” for robots that heals itself
science

Explained: How a team of Japanese scientists invented “human living skin” for robots that heals itself

A team of Japanese scientists have developed artificial skin that behaves just like living human skin. It can repel water and “heal” or repair itself when wounded. Seems like the days of the Terminator finally becoming a reality isn’t that far off.

Explained: What is a ‘climate club’ and why is Germany endorsing it at the G7 summit?
World

Explained: What is a ‘climate club’ and why is Germany endorsing it at the G7 summit?

The idea for a climate club was floated by Yale economist William Nordhaus, who proposed that countries which were serious about reducing emissions could come together. They could set targets and exempt each other from climate-related trade tariffs