Amazon Pay
SBI
Grofers

'Pakistan doesn't do a damn thing for US': Donald Trump's bluster, unlike Bush-Obama restraint, pushes ties to brink

When it comes to Pakistan, US president Donald Trump's uncompromising approach — backed by strong rhetoric — is far removed from that of his predecessors, George W Bush and Barack Obama.

Trump's latest jibe at Pakistan came on Sunday when he defended his administration's decision to stop military aid to the country during an interview to Fox News.

Referring to Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and his former compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, Trump said, "You know, living – think of this – living in Pakistan, beautifully in Pakistan in what I guess they considered a nice mansion, I don't know, I've seen nicer."

The compound was demolished shortly after US forces, in a daring helicopter raid, killed Laden there in 2011.

"But living in Pakistan right next to the military academy, everybody in Pakistan knew he was there," he added.

"And we give Pakistan $1.3 billion a year. ... (Laden) lived in Pakistan, we're supporting Pakistan, we're giving them $1.3 billion a year — which we don't give them anymore, by the way, I ended it because they don't do anything for us, they don't do a damn thing for us," he said.

Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan reacted sharply to Trump's latest tirade and said the US should find out why the Taliban has emerged stronger than before, instead of making Pakistan a "scapegoat" for its failures in Afghanistan.

Under the Trump administration, US-Pakistan relations have been faltering since 2017, when he first publicly hit out at Islamabad for providing safe havens to "agents of chaos" who kill Americans in Afghanistan.

File photo of US president Donald Trump. Reuters

File photo of US president Donald Trump. Reuters

After the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, Obama, too, warned Pakistan on multiple occasions that it must shut down terrorist safe havens. "I've made it clear that even as the United States works with Pakistan to meet the threat of terrorism, safe havens within Pakistan are not acceptable and that those behind the Mumbai terrorist attack must face justice," he had said in an interview.

However, Obama chose a conflicted tone for most of his tenure. In a 2009 address, Obama spoke on his strategy for an "effective partnership" with Pakistan. "We will strengthen Pakistan's capacity to target those groups that threaten our countries, and have made it clear that we cannot tolerate a safe haven for terrorists whose location is known, and whose intentions are clear... Going forward, the Pakistani people must know: America will remain a strong supporter of Pakistan's security and prosperity long after the guns have fallen silent, so that the great potential of its people can be unleashed," he said.

As journalist Barkha Dutt noted in her article for The Washington Post, it was Obama’s "contradictory framework" that let Pakistan continue with its "good-terrorist, bad-terrorist distinctions between extremist groups."

Sure, the US withdrew $800 million in aid to Pakistan's military in 2011, but the suspended bit of financial support only represented 40 percent of the $2 billion overall aid.

Even Bush's approach was more or less like that of Obama's.

After a 2007 US intelligence report said that al-Qaeda had become entrenched in a safe haven in Pakistan’s tribal region near Afghanistan, he said that the assessment was "one of the most troubling". But Bush offered support for the then Pakistani president, and said he believed Pervez Musharraf was committed to fighting al-Qaeda and Taliban militants.

Trump, on the other hand, has gone all out to ensure that there is no room for ambiguity. At the beginning of 2018, he tweeted on similar lines as his Sunday interview.

One of the major factors for his hardline policy on Pakistan could be his personal opposition to Pakistan's behaviour. He had voiced concerns over the "billions and billions of dollars" of military aid even when he wasn't the president.

Despite all the controversies and criticism, what sets Trump apart is his attempt to look beyond the bilateral relations and take the leap. What this will do to bilateral ties and peace in South Asia remains to be seen.

With inputs from agencies


Updated Date: Nov 19, 2018 21:22 PM

Also See