Pakistan court rejects Pervez Musharraf's plea for adjournment on hearing, cancels his right of defence
A special court in Pakistan rejected Pervez Musharraf's plea to adjourn of the hearing of a high treason case against him on medical grounds.
A special court rejected Pervez Musharraf's plea for adjournment of the hearing of a high treason case against him on medical grounds
Due to Musharraf's repeated non-appearance before the court. a three-judge bench headed by Justice Tahira Safdar also cancelled Musharraf's right of defence
The Pakistan Muslim League led by Nawaz Sharif government had filed the treason case against Musharraf in 2013 over the imposition of extra-constitutional emergency in 2007
Islamabad: A special court in Pakistan on Wednesday rejected Pervez Musharraf, former military dictator's plea for adjournment of the hearing of a high treason case against him on medical grounds and decided to conclude the trial even in his absence. A three-judge bench headed by Justice Tahira Safdar also cancelled Musharraf's right of defence due to his repeated non-appearance before the court.
The previous Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government had filed the treason case against the ex-army chief in 2013 over the imposition of extra-constitutional emergency in November 2007, which led to the confinement of a number of superior court judges in their houses and sacking of over 100 judges. The trial has not seen much progress since Musharraf, 75, left for Dubai in March 2016 after his name was removed from the Exit Control List.
He has not returned since and is said to be suffering from amyloidosis, a rare condition for which he has been admitted to a hospital. The special court has declared him a proclaimed offender and ordered the confiscation of his property owing to his no-show. The case has been virtually stalled as Musharraf's presence is important to record his statement.
The Supreme Court in a judgment on 1 April said that Musharraf can come back to record statement by 2 May, otherwise, the tribunal was free to conclude hearing even in his absence. On 2 May, Musharraf requested the court to delay proceedings until the end of the holy month of fasting. So the court adjourned and set 12 June for hearing and his appearance. But he failed to turn up and his lawyer Salman Safdar, Musharraf's lawyer requested the tribunal to delay the proceedings until improvement in the health of Musharraf so that he could come back.
The bench, headed by Justice Tahira, rejected the plea with the observation that proceedings could no longer be halted due to the accused's illness. The tribunal said the former ruler is a fugitive and has lost the right to engage a counsel unless he surrenders.
"In view of the established principle that a trial could not be held in abeyance or could be adjourned for an indefinite period couple with findings of the Supreme Court, whereby it was held that the accused being fugitive from law, thus loses his right to audience, also lost to have an advocate appointed to defend him unless he surrenders himself before the court," reads the written order.
The tribunal directed the Ministry of Law and Justice to recommend a panel of advocates to defend the former army chief. Salman Safdar said that his client was not fit physically and mentally to come back and record a statement. He said Musharraf was on a wheelchair and “fighting for his life”. He requested to condone the absence of Musharraf and give permission to statement via video link.
The court rejected both pleas and set 27 June as the next date of hearing. While speaking to the media, Musharraf's lawyer said that they had presented medical and photographic evidence in court so that the judges could get an idea of Musharraf's condition. He said that there were "no two opinions" about his client's current condition, adding that he was very unwell. Musharraf ruled the country from 1999 to 2008. A conviction for high treason carries the death penalty or life imprisonment.
Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro at ₹499 for the first year. Use code PRO499. Limited period offer. *T&C apply
The nation's highest court delivered a blow to the ex-president, who has been waging a protracted legal battle to prevent his tax records from being handed over to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance
The apex court said the proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will go on and but will not culminate into any final order on an amalgamation of FRL with Reliance
While Uttar Pradesh alleged in the apex court that there is collusion between Ansari and Punjab Police, the Amarinder Singh government refuted these claims and raised questions over the maintainability of plea filed by the Yogi Adityanath-led government